From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: scan: Rearrange acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb()
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:36:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <308f4eb8-8a8b-2cb8-bf99-cc112e812f47@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9924939.nUPlyArG6x@kreacher>
Hi,
On 6/16/21 4:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Make acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() a bit more straightforward
> and rewrite the comment in it.
>
> No functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -2107,13 +2107,12 @@ static int acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_d
> struct acpi_device *adev;
>
> adev = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(dep->consumer);
> - if (!adev)
> - /* If we don't find an adev then we want to continue parsing */
> - return 0;
> -
> - *(struct acpi_device **)data = adev;
> -
> - return 1;
> + if (adev) {
> + *(struct acpi_device **)data = adev;
> + return 1;
> + }
> + /* Continue parsing if the device object is not present. */
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int acpi_scan_clear_dep(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-16 14:21 [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: scan: Fixes and cleanups related to dependencies list handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: scan: Rearrange acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:36 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-06-16 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_walk_dep_device_list() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:41 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 15:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 15:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 15:28 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] ACPI: scan: Fix device object rescan in acpi_scan_clear_dep() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:48 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 15:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: scan: Reorganize acpi_device_add() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:49 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: scan: Fix race related to dropping dependencies Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 14:55 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-16 15:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 18:00 ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-06-16 18:04 ` Hans de Goede
2021-06-17 0:25 ` [PATCH " kernel test robot
2021-06-17 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-17 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH] ACPI: scan: __acpi_device_add() can be static kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=308f4eb8-8a8b-2cb8-bf99-cc112e812f47@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox