From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:23:28 +0200 Message-ID: <3134535.L6At3I31FS@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1434362256-239992-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20150706160529.GC3182@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:49519 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753950AbbGFV5J convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 17:57:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150706160529.GC3182@x1> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Andy Shevchenko , Geert Uytterhoeven , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PM list , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vinod Koul , Andrew Morton , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , dmaengine , Heikki Krogerus , Jarkko Nikula , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , Mike Turquette On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones wr= ote: > > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >=20 > > [] > >=20 > > >> > > > Applied, thanks. > > >> > > > > >> > > Hmm=E2=80=A6 Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (= and required > > >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in > > >> > > (today's) > > >> > > linux-next. > > >> > > > >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before = v4.2 > > >> > -rc1 was > > >> > released (which just happened last night)? > > >> > > >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and th= at's > > >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already appli= ed. So, > > >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repos= itory? > > > > > > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to come > > > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel versio= n > > > (which you probably don't want, right?). > > > > > > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot ca= n be > > > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem. > >=20 > > I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches > > included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they are > > the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify what > > exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your > > subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series. >=20 > Easiest thing for me to do is unapply. >=20 > We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued. So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html