From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3DEC46467 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232469AbjAKPCV (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:02:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37840 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234822AbjAKPCL (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:02:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA8A41C916 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:01:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id e3so6103277wru.13 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:01:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AaucJbeurArINzx/XqwlyeZxosCdZQCp+GGH59FoJLw=; b=BzJQPThURwdCce7DSuHydqHFnFmMUYBpD8p+nqaJSxRUdS/2Xl6wckfZ2HjLnPcPN5 wE5o0YbTLBfcesWxHslwUojicom7kbnBpm/v0z81lnYABLl3zBtYkIGzU6YIRzS/xBbD zoPhqylLhAalYVX5/wBk0lX/HSDo6UY5fOVP5d/8+BYOIRVReHteo4i9Xb5fkae6z17t VwIpjW6WO/aL14f9vG9eq51Y/J5Lj85/30T3kzQlI/42D5pUn5Gjk0ZI5r/yZGplPf09 N3xi77sGwgWRjHNUuW7U91/x4ntr6EPjW7tKYoUeYibNGdhTofrob3G1eoPTgQNxEiGb 8iJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AaucJbeurArINzx/XqwlyeZxosCdZQCp+GGH59FoJLw=; b=yajtHCKYiRdh/xsrpGf+0Q0FhgW8e4LaPpmEHIDOQkIJbN/Bbp7xWt5+m7zMqu/DoF Fh7PTW4dIujWxYWfwiBD4SKYLjlPonOwfDf9+ZAdEbjJixdu6MfPcASvzS4bZuQYvrp7 amnSes9uz4G5JHHqO+Tm35vfq8nWAUhr1zAH7H/WO5WzMmNonpmV4XnVR05kzmymt8CA 1G1v6dkxKhEhZ/+SUqWm4obJK85nuKca34NyOOFvJliC5usH/7azQxNWdQj8U0zJC9r3 eNtoDM0i6RJ4xorUNaXjaaNwxce+mBRU5WdxgwfBrngPO0sbT13T8FTFsqZz+sC1auxE 1upQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krySv7+7vG6bgEH+3U9QM12+5+eDqSXtLhD1vARQQvzmVUnWevL kDHKT+XewSLHfJGEB7gdWGtLWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtpWlmaH1CYDfLd+6Dy7rAPz1iLEIGX1Pos50zqDNV/j7WqrZblwbuWeIbTNepd9+4SFvngww== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4cc2:0:b0:2a3:3a96:709a with SMTP id c2-20020a5d4cc2000000b002a33a96709amr21707353wrt.57.1673449318389; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:01:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.10.46] (146725694.box.freepro.com. [130.180.211.218]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z6-20020a05600c0a0600b003d96efd09b7sm27310573wmp.19.2023.01.11.07.01.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:01:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <31c07acb-adcf-3c7e-c415-fa2cd67fd12f@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:01:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Thermal ACPI APIs for generic trip points Content-Language: en-US To: "Zhang, Rui" , "rafael@kernel.org" Cc: "srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" References: <20230110151745.2546131-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> From: Daniel Lezcano In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 11/01/2023 15:49, Zhang, Rui wrote: > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 12:52 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Can I consider these changes ok for thermal/bleeding-edge ? >> >> > Hi, Daniel, > > In general, the patch looks good to me. > But can you give me more time so that I can test them on my test box by > this week? Ah, yes, definitively. If you have a test box for these changes that is awesome. Do you have a suggestion for a x86 platform to test quark_dts, processor_thermal_device_pci and intel_soc_dts_iosf ? -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog