From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:47:51 +0200
Message-ID: <3246744.xVj4sLRlWl@wuerfel>
References: <1430315049-4663-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <5542288.z0SSOZ4xV7@wuerfel> <5540EE97.70202@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:61819 "EHLO
	mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1031731AbbD2OsL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:48:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5540EE97.70202@amd.com>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org

On Wednesday 29 April 2015 09:45:43 Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 09:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 08:44:09 Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >> +                       device->flags.cca_seen = 1;
> >> +               } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA)) {
> >> +                       /*
> >> +                        * Architecture has specified that if the device
> >> +                        * can do DMA, it must have ACPI _CCA object.
> >> +                        * Here, there could be two cases:
> >> +                        *   1. Not DMA-able device.
> >> +                        *   2. DMA-able device, but missing _CCA object.
> >> +                        *
> >> +                        * In both cases, we will default to dma non-coherent.
> >> +                        */
> >> +                       cca = 0;
> >> +               } else {
> >> +                       /*
> >> +                        * If architecture does not specify that device must
> >> +                        * specify ACPI _CCA (e.g. x86), we default to use
> >> +                        * dma coherent.
> >> +                        */
> >> +                       cca = 1;
> >> +               }
> >>
> >
> > What does it mean here if a device does DMA but is not coherent? Do you
> > have an example of a server that needs this?
> >
> > Can we please make the default for ARM64 cca=1 as well?
> >
> >       Arnd
> >
> 
> Actually, I am trying to implement the logic for when missing _CCA to be 
> consistent with the behavior when the devicetree entry does not specify 
> "dma-coherent" property. IIUC, in such case, Linux will default to using 
> non-coherent DMA.

Why?

	Arnd