From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/10] ata: zpodd: check zero power ready status Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:03:53 +0100 Message-ID: <3650037.tRRn9I6XAb@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1352443922-13734-1-git-send-email-aaron.lu@intel.com> <6529392.v4vtIGQYok@vostro.rjw.lan> <50B2BC73.5010905@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50B2BC73.5010905@intel.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Aaron Lu Cc: Tejun Heo , Alan Stern , Jeff Garzik , James Bottomley , Jeff Wu , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday, November 26, 2012 08:48:51 AM Aaron Lu wrote: > On 11/26/2012 08:50 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 04:59:57 PM Aaron Lu wrote: > >> On 11/20/2012 02:00 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > >>> On 11/19/2012 10:56 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >>>> I really think we need a way for (auto)pm and event polling to talk to > >>>> each other so that autopm can tell event poll to sod off while pm is > >>>> in effect. Trying to solve this from inside libata doesn't seem > >>>> right. The problem, again, seems to be figuring out which hardware > >>>> device maps to which block device. Hmmm... Any good ideas? > >>> > >>> A possible way of doing this is using pm qos. > >>> > >>> We currently have 2 pm qos flags, NO_POWER_OFF and REMOTE_WAKEUP, and we > >>> can add another one: NO_POLL, use it like the following: > >>> 1 Set the NO_POLL pm qos flag when the underlying driver thinks it is no > >>> longer necessary. In the ZPODD's case, it should be set when the > >>> device is to be powered off; > >>> 2 Clear it when poll is necessary again. In the ZPODD's case, when power > >>> is re-gained, this flag will be cleared. > >> > >> > >>> 3 In the disk_events_workfn, check if this flag is set, if so, simply > >>> return. > >> > >> It should be, skip calling disk->fops->check_events, but still queue the > >> work for next time's poll. > >> > >> -Aaron > >> > >>> > >>> The disk->driverfs_dev can be used to host the pm qos flag, ATA layer > >>> can access it through ata_device->sdev->sdev_gendev. > >>> > >>> Is this OK? > > > > No, I don't think so. PM QoS is about telling the layer that will put the > > device into low-power states what states are to be taken into consideration. > > In this case, however, we need to tell someone else that the device has been > > turned off. Clearly, we need a way to do that, but not through PM QoS. > > > > Did you consider using pm_runtime_suspended() to check the device status? > > The problem is, a device can be in runtime suspended state while still > needs to be polled... Well, maybe this is the problem, then? Why does it need to be polled when suspended? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.