From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073A616F91C; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712330963; cv=none; b=VxhX27hponqirZsv2aWZwU+ulGcaA7bvp247l37pMbyK9pN8i5aH7ypLEfdXDoz1xdj3Yefx12j/JwGzmmotbAWDweONtsbyYaRH87a9SBjTfbxEzJP0b3bC5GZdvjsvBJp016iUNYhxuqAPqlyYM5zYY02H1vVLwhmTXRJSM5A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712330963; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OYqGBKrBY5SfTMrFR35DAFdlrk1wcg641xZ+cluwDl4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=X9p2Gp9bqphALghi1Z0k/KSKTF1OL6XbaOLmj2b8RK+cTU+3cV5GKhxPsD+SZVe9T7qBSVJyL/fzhf4SxJUvYqsVDFwkOCsSH1fznprHmqwYqyoYgS3vWP0F+641hat/nqpXapVVybVSWBp0hOhg58uh4CE3X+EHSYMlSi8DeXE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YiBSLSW9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YiBSLSW9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712330962; x=1743866962; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OYqGBKrBY5SfTMrFR35DAFdlrk1wcg641xZ+cluwDl4=; b=YiBSLSW9WG/ILNeB3z2ckUVg/N8NXUctDslOBCqfExg17jb2dt9QKNmI YYMjaxv8oHr2flBtb+9B3LTpTEbzaQ3UF8rIuq2ceUHhjL+OnXlkm23v3 56wgaMPbpoWAVLkEVNXYsS60x+4VdAUuzuiThYsanXSYHucHY+wR6Yaf8 X7S5sEBv5VQ6mgzIobV7WQezycRHbuCAK6D+PefBcF0g/hb809VGmKmEZ Ouec2QjwjKObUuZInrNP/yghLXzJPWSJDwDpSqMxxyfw0QVbHm3SgxxLN 39MYXxyCSviqBWj4/lsMSGjCMdJUmja8HYn13J0LdiVVyVSOt+komNAit A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: f+Lq6uj0SkO3wNdJmmoZMA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bxxLuSy/RjWjtevxFr8TUA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11035"; a="7505186" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,181,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7505186" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2024 08:29:21 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QudFO+hDT8K1ZFTSFgdMWw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7CooQxbpT0WLEe0Pz0NCUw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,181,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="23933087" Received: from mdawoo-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.152.63]) ([10.212.152.63]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2024 08:29:21 -0700 Message-ID: <36bb25c6-bb0b-4a95-936f-0f0333b2d1cf@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:29:20 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ACPI: x86: Move blacklist to x86 folder To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Zhang Rui , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown References: <20240404183448.3310449-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240404183448.3310449-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <311c6f62-4232-417a-beb8-df9ca8a732ec@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/5/24 8:19 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:44:15AM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: >> On 4/4/24 11:23 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> blacklist is built solely for x86, move it to the respective folder. >> Don't you need #ifdef CONFIG_X86 for acpi_blacklisted() in >> include/linux/acpi.h > It's unrelated to this series. > It was like that before and this series doesn't change this aspect. > > AFAICS the API is called from x86 only, that's why it's not a problem, > but strictly speaking you are right. Feel free to submit a patch. > Agree. -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer