From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valette Eric Subject: Re: Re: making progress with ACPI was: ACPI small patch update Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:29:27 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <3DBFA677.5010700@free.fr> References: <200210300925.g9U9PbD05581@ikffws2.ikff.uni-stuttgart.de> Reply-To: eric.valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Jens Haug Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Jens Haug wrote: >>I have been working for famous companies and yes having a bug tracking >>system was required and compled with the source management system. > > > But this wasn't public, was it? Yes it was unless submitter requested explicitely the contrary. > No company distributes ACPI for linux. No but companies are seeling ACPI compatible processors... -- eric ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf