* Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
@ 2002-12-07 14:50 Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF20AB4.3020205-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Gulik @ 2002-12-07 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
I recently got a Toshiba Satellite 1115-S103 laptop which only has ACPI
power management. Obviously the drivers in RH 8.0 (kernel version
2.4.18-18.8) don't do anything useful.
I was hoping to try out a newer development driver but I'm not sure if
it's best to just try the acpi-20020918 for which 2.4.18 patches are
available, or should I not bother with those and go with the latest
drivers for 2.4.20, which obviously means upgrading to that kernel???
--
Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org http://www.drivingevents.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
[not found] ` <3DF20AB4.3020205-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-12-07 15:11 ` Sander Smeenk
2002-12-09 10:51 ` Ducrot Bruno
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sander Smeenk @ 2002-12-07 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gregory Gulik; +Cc: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
Quoting Gregory Gulik (greg-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org):
> I was hoping to try out a newer development driver but I'm not sure if
> it's best to just try the acpi-20020918 for which 2.4.18 patches are
> available, or should I not bother with those and go with the latest
> drivers for 2.4.20, which obviously means upgrading to that kernel???
I'd say upgrade to that kernel. :)
--
| Age is a very high price to pay for maturity.
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
[not found] ` <3DF20AB4.3020205-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-07 15:11 ` Sander Smeenk
@ 2002-12-09 10:51 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20021209105144.GB26375-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ducrot Bruno @ 2002-12-09 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gregory Gulik; +Cc: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:50:28AM -0500, Gregory Gulik wrote:
>
> I recently got a Toshiba Satellite 1115-S103 laptop which only has ACPI
> power management. Obviously the drivers in RH 8.0 (kernel version
> 2.4.18-18.8) don't do anything useful.
>
> I was hoping to try out a newer development driver but I'm not sure if
> it's best to just try the acpi-20020918 for which 2.4.18 patches are
This one have know bug. Try a more recent one.
--
Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
[not found] ` <20021209105144.GB26375-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-12-09 13:56 ` Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF4A0F4.6060103-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Gulik @ 2002-12-09 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ducrot Bruno; +Cc: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
I ended up upgrading my kernel to 2.4.20 and applied the
acpi-20021205-2.4.20.diff.
I turned off APM and chose the following ACPI related kernel config options:
# CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI is not set
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_ACPI_BUSMGR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_SYS=m
CONFIG_ACPI_CPU=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_CMBATT=m
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
For some reason no modules were installed in /lib/modules/2.4.20:
[root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]# find /lib/modules/2.4.20 -name '*acpi*'
-print
[root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]#
Just to make sure I started over and did it again. Same thing.
I'm sure I'm missing just one simple step.
Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> This one have know bug. Try a more recent one.
>
--
Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org http://www.drivingevents.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
[not found] ` <3DF4A0F4.6060103-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-12-09 14:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20021209140714.H20336-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2002-12-09 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gregory Gulik; +Cc: Ducrot Bruno, acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:56:04AM -0500, Gregory Gulik wrote:
> For some reason no modules were installed in /lib/modules/2.4.20:
did you run `make modules_install'?
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
[not found] ` <20021209140714.H20336-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-12-09 14:14 ` Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF4A54F.2030400-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Gulik @ 2002-12-09 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox; +Cc: Ducrot Bruno, acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
Of course.
I just ran it again just now for about the tenth time and still no go.
Here's the relavant part of the output from "make modules_install":
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/drivers'^M
make -C acpi modules_install^M
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/drivers/acpi'^M
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `modules_install'.^M
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/drivers/acpi'^M
make -C atm modules_install^M
Yet that directory does seem to contain the files:
[root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]# ls drivers/acpi/
Config.in battery.c executer ospm resources
Makefile blacklist.c fan.c parser system.c
ac.c bus.c hardware pci_bind.c tables
acpi.o button.c include pci_irq.c tables.c
acpi_bus.h dispatcher namespace pci_link.c thermal.c
acpi_drivers.h driver.o numa.c pci_root.c toshiba_acpi.c
acpi_ksyms.c ec.c os.o power.c utilities
acpi_ksyms.o events osl.c processor.c utils.c
[root@toshiba1115 linux-2.4.20]#
Maybe I'll just wipe out that directory and start all over with a fresh
copy of the kernel sources and acpi patch...
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> did you run `make modules_install'?
>
--
Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org http://www.drivingevents.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
[not found] ` <3DF4A54F.2030400-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-12-09 15:12 ` Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF4B2F6.6070400-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Gulik @ 2002-12-09 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
I did that my starting with a clean 2.4.20 kernel, applied the
acpi-20021205-2.4.20.diff patches, reconfigured my kernel, did the
correct kernel build procedure. Everything worked without apparent
error and I do have files in the acpi driver directory:
[root@toshiba1115 pcmcia-cs-3.2.3]# ls
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/
ac.o battery.o button.o fan.o processor.o thermal.o toshiba_acpi.o
While updating my PCMCIA driver I saw the following errors:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.2.3/etc/cis'
-> Updating client scripts in /etc/pcmcia
-> Running depmod...
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/ac.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/button.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/fan.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/processor.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/thermal.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.o
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.2.3/etc'
[root@toshiba1115 pcmcia-cs-3.2.3]#
Is this anything to worry about??
Gregory Gulik wrote:
> Maybe I'll just wipe out that directory and start all over with a fresh
> copy of the kernel sources and acpi patch...
--
Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org http://www.drivingevents.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support...
[not found] ` <3DF4B2F6.6070400-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-12-09 20:20 ` Gregory Gulik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Gulik @ 2002-12-09 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A
Still no joy...
Even tough everything "seemed" to compile and install I can't load my
ACPI modules. Any time I try I get stuff like this:
[root@toshiba1115 root]# insmod battery 2>&1 | more
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_get_handle_R2bfeb410
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_ut_exit_R4403d3ee
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_os_free_R43b9bbb4
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_extract_package_R06f4a82a
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_ut_trace_R8d457864
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_remove_notify_handler_R2bb55d6e
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_ut_value_exit_Rdcbde352
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_evaluate_object_R39f1a5dc
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_bus_get_status_Redecd2bd
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_ut_debug_print_Rac38b5ca
/lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.o: unresolved symbol
acpi_bus_generate_event_R03047640
...and so on...
I even logged the output of "make modules" and checked the acpi stuff
and there is no sign of any kinds of errors...
--
Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/
greg @ gulik.org http://www.drivingevents.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-09 20:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-07 14:50 Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF20AB4.3020205-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-07 15:11 ` Sander Smeenk
2002-12-09 10:51 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20021209105144.GB26375-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 13:56 ` Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF4A0F4.6060103-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 14:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20021209140714.H20336-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 14:14 ` Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF4A54F.2030400-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 15:12 ` Gregory Gulik
[not found] ` <3DF4B2F6.6070400-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 20:20 ` Gregory Gulik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox