From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Tippett Subject: Re: ospmd or acpid Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 10:48:13 -0500 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <3DF8AFBD.1040200@casero.com> References: <3DF8A5CF.1000909@casero.com> <004c01c2a2bc$d19bdf80$8cfa6386@TRINITY> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <004c01c2a2bc$d19bdf80$8cfa6386-naq7wT523jg@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Knut Neumann Cc: Matthew Tippett , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thanks, you answered the question. So I will be sticking with acpid until all the ACPI support for my system is under control ;). Matt Knut Neumann wrote: >>Just a quick question regarding the user space daemons for ACPI. There >>is ospmd which is part of the acpi project, and there is acpid which is >>a seperate project which Andrew is a member of both. > > > Hmm...so what is your question? I assume you meant to ask which daemon to > use, so if thats right read on: > > While acpid already reached version 1.0 and is quite ready to use, ospmd is > supposed to be better of the two but it is still under development - though > actually no one is really working on it. When its done it should replace not > only acpid but also apmd and it is thought to handle UPSes and other power > related devices as well. > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/