From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Malte Thoma Subject: Re: performance & fan & heatload & suspend Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 19:37:22 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <3E187B62.9050709@muenster.de> References: <3E06C494.3060408@uni-muenster.de> <20021223135527.GA658@zaurus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20021223135527.GA658-XqDnSF8rrUM@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Pavel Machek Cc: acpi-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: >Hi! > > > >>By the way: What do you think about suspend: should a graphical >>interface should be able to put the computer to sleep (with swsusp)? >>I think it would be a good idea, but is this an action only privilegd >>users should be able to, or should EVERY user how is allowd to adjust >>fan/throttling/performance be also allowed to suspend a computer? >>( Technical spoken: should there be an extra entry in /etc/sudoers >>for suspend or can the fan/throttling/performancce entry be shared, >>what do you think about it? >> >> > >Any user permitted to turn machine off should >be permitted to make it sleep. > Done, heatload now supports swsusp and performance via context menu. Greetings, Malte You can find it here: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/heatload/ Any tests are welcome ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf