From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Wohlgemuth Subject: Re: ACPI vs. PCMCIA on Compaq Evo N800c Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 10:43:45 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <3EABECA1.5070202@woogie.net> References: <3EAB29E2.5030702@woogie.net> <20030427100023.A16436@fermat.unipv.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030427100023.A16436-xzhXYMPkGmXoPXhRcRtihA@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Daniele Boffi wrote: >Mike, >I have got a Evo N800v which should not be much different from N800c. I would >say my acpi is fully functional (besides a small problem with CPU performance >status: it works fine, changing its status when on AC or battery, but is not >reported correctly in /proc/acpi). >I don't see your problem. Actually, I've never tried to use PCMCIA since >I don't need it, but here is the output of cardctl and lspci. > > Thanks for the reply. Your lspci output looks almost identical to mine, except that I have a lucent winmodem. I was going to ask what distribution you are running, but you mentioned RH8 in a later email. I'll guess I'll give that a shot, although I would hope there wouldn't be too drastic a change between compiling 2.4.20 under RH8 and compiling 2.4.20 under RH9. Thanks Mike ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf