From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sjb Subject: Re: best acpi solution Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 14:19:11 +0000 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <3ECB8ADF.5020108@ottaky.com> References: <3ECB3CE2.5000400@ottaky.com> <01db01c31f90$84ae6840$3746028e@bio.dfo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <01db01c31f90$84ae6840$3746028e-dP0OE4Ef7fWw5LPnMra/2Q@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Derek Broughton Cc: ACPI List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Derek Broughton wrote: > The _easiest_ would almost certainly be to continue using the kernel you already > had... *8-) Fair point. OK, the easiest way assuming that I want to build my own kernel from scratch. sjb ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge