From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sjb Subject: Re: best acpi solution Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:21:11 +0000 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <3ECBA777.9090100@ottaky.com> References: <3ECB3CE2.5000400@ottaky.com> <01db01c31f90$84ae6840$3746028e@bio.dfo.ca> <3ECB8ADF.5020108@ottaky.com> <20030521142117.GX346@poupinou.org> <3ECB9BB8.9070700@ottaky.com> <20030521150233.GY346@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030521150233.GY346-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: ACPI List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Ducrot Bruno wrote: > I meant the latest 2.4 ac tree (not 2.5) because tt has > recent acpi and cpufreq (for longrun) and therefore no need > to apply 2 patches. Another dumb question .. where would I find that? Is it a question of running these patahces http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/linux-2.4/2.4.21/patch-2.4.21-rc2-ac2.gz against the corresponding 2.4.21 kernel? sjb ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge