From: Dimitri Rebrikov <dimitri.rebrikov-kyawv7ubMNaakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: AE_TIME on Operations in EC ( Embedded Controller ec.c )
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:44:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F657BDB.9080805@t-systems.com> (raw)
Hi,
after i installed 2.4.22 on my Notebook i couldn't get
any battery information more. (i.e. nothing in /proc/acpi/battery)
BTW. I had no problem with ACPI before (2.4.18+ACPI and 2.4.20+ACPI)
The corresponding error message in log was:
Sep 5 12:49:57 mitnb kernel: evregion-0345: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_TIME
Sep 5 12:49:57 mitnb kernel: psparse-1121: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node cee7cdc8), AE_TIME
Other embedded controls (i.e. thermal, fan etc) were not affected by this problem.
After some testing i located (i belief) the issue:
The values of ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT and/or ACPI_EC_UDELAY are too small
for my Hardware.
Here is the comparision between 2.4.20+ACPI and 2.4.22:
./linux-2.4.20/drivers/acpi/ec.c:#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY 1000 /* Poll @ 100us increments */
./linux-2.4.20/drivers/acpi/ec.c:#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT 10000 /* Wait 10ms max. during EC ops */
./linux-2.4.22/drivers/acpi/ec.c:#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY 100 /* Poll @ 100us increments */
./linux-2.4.22/drivers/acpi/ec.c:#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT 1000 /* Wait 10ms max. during EC ops */
This means that the wait time for a EC operation in 2.4.22 was reduced with factor 100.
After i increase the value of ACPI_EC_UDELAY_COUNT to 10000
my problems gone. Now i can use the whole functionality of ACPI.
I don't know is there something in the ACPI specifikation defining max. wait time during EC op,
or the values in ec.c was investigated by testing.
My Hardware: (Clevo D270S Notebook, Pentium 4 M 1.8)
http://www.clevo.com.tw/products/D220S.asp
Regards
Dimitri
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-15 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 8:44 Dimitri Rebrikov [this message]
[not found] ` <3F657BDB.9080805-kyawv7ubMNaakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-15 20:54 ` AE_TIME on Operations in EC ( Embedded Controller ec.c ) Nate Lawson
2003-09-16 12:32 ` Dimitri Rebrikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F657BDB.9080805@t-systems.com \
--to=dimitri.rebrikov-kyawv7ubmnaakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox