From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bas Mevissen Subject: Re: Battery status reading problems Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:55:08 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <3F6EAADC.4020509@basmevissen.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Markus Gaugusch Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Markus Gaugusch wrote: > On Sep 18, Jan Rychter wrote: > >>Reading the battery status still consumes insane amounts of CPU time > > Recently, a bug has been fixed by some nice person at intel - the AML code > was executed twice. Although half of the time is still not perfect, it is > a lot better now. > But on Windows, there is no slowdown noticeable. Is that just the different implementation or is there still something (too) slow in the Intel ACPI CA code? Bas. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf