Personally, I think so.

Yu, Luming a écrit :

> Does it mean the overhead of SCI interrupt was not the root cause of 
> this issue. --Luming
>  
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* roychris [mailto:roychris-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org]
>     *Sent:* 2003?12?3? 20:49
>     *To:* Pavel Machek
>     *Cc:* Yu, Luming; acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>     *Subject:* Re: [ACPI] SCI interrupt handler : spend too much time
>
>     Just a precision,
>     synaptic driver is not like the other mouses. psmouse call a
>     specific fonction for this touchpad that is in an other module.
>     The problem happens since 2.6, since psmouse and synaptic had been
>     seperated....
>
>     Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>  
>>
>>>It sound like serious one, if SCI interrupt handler was blamed for
>>>this issue.     --Luming
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>I investigated a bit, and interrupt latency alone is not enough to
>>break mouse. [Unfortunately, I do not have easy/sure way to reproduce
>>it.]
>>
>>Is it possible that SCI interrupt handler accesses keyboard controller
>>(and breaks mouse?)
>>								Pavel
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>