public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: Plea for help
@ 2003-12-31  9:58 Yu, Luming
       [not found] ` <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C66-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Luming @ 2003-12-31  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Pilcher; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

>Yu, Luming wrote:
> I want to you build a kernel with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG , which could show

> some ACPI debug message that could help us to roughly determine what
> could
> cause panic ! 
>
>I have added a new set of files (acpi_debug) to
>
>     http://home.comcast.net/~i.pilcher/panics.tar.gz

I'm not sure, but the most possibility is at acpi_ev_create_gpe_block.
Normally, the next expected message  would be like:

evxfevnt-0093 [04] acpi_enable           : Transition to ACPI mode
successful
evgpeblk-0747 [06] ev_create_gpe_block   : GPE 00 to 15 [_GPE] 2 regs at
0000009

I did find the desultory words showing that in ACPI-DEBUG dmesg.  Is it
possible to dig into ?
BTW, I want to know whether that panic could be found in UP kernel.

Thanks,
Luming 





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1278&alloc_id371&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: Plea for help
@ 2004-01-02  7:34 Yu, Luming
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Luming @ 2004-01-02  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Pilcher; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

>>Yu, Luming wrote:
>> I'm not sure, but the most possibility is at
acpi_ev_create_gpe_block.
>> Normally, the next expected message  would be like:
>> 
>> evxfevnt-0093 [04] acpi_enable           : Transition to ACPI mode
>> successful
>> evgpeblk-0747 [06] ev_create_gpe_block   : GPE 00 to 15 [_GPE] 2 regs
at
>> 0000009
>> 
>> I did find the desultory words showing that in ACPI-DEBUG dmesg.  Is
it
>> possible to dig into ?
>
>The attached file is what appears on the local console (modulo possible
>typos).  You can see that these messages do appear, mixed in with the
>panic information.

Since I cannot reporduce it on my side. Would you please dig into 
function acpi_ev_create_gpe_block.


>> BTW, I want to know whether that panic could be found in UP kernel.
>
>The panic does not occur with a uniprocessor kernel, nor does it happen
>when I boot with 'maxcpus=1'.

Hmm, It sounds like SMP relative issue.

>And just for grins and giggles, I tried booting with 'idle=poll'.  Sure
>enough, no panic.

I'm confused! 

>Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

--Luming


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1278&alloc_id371&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: Plea for help
@ 2003-12-24  6:04 Yu, Luming
       [not found] ` <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C53-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Luming @ 2003-12-24  6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Pilcher, Randy.Dunlap; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

>> Is there some reason that you build a kernel with both APM and ACPI
>> support?  Can you test it without APM support, to see if it changes
any?

I want to you build a kernel with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG , which could show 
some ACPI debug message that could help us to roughly determine what
could
cause panic ! 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1278&alloc_id371&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Plea for help
@ 2003-12-19  5:41 Ian Pilcher
       [not found] ` <3FE28F79.601-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
       [not found] ` <3FE33B69.1010606@netspace.org>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pilcher @ 2003-12-19  5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

I posted a couple of weeks ago about a kernel panic that shows up when I
boot my Abit VP6 (dual-PIII) with ACPI turned on.  It turns out that the
kernel boots just fine with ACPI on when I build it with
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y.

Alan Cox suggested that this is probably due to code that kmallocs
memory and then relies on its content without clearing it, but I never
received any response to my request for suggestions on how to identify
the offending code.

I've just spent several hours adding printk statements to the ACPI code,
and I've reached a point where the oops message is overwriting portions
of my printk messages.  I have the sinking feeling that this indicates
that the process executing the ACPI code is not the one that's oops'ing.

I'm stuck.  How can a relative newbie debug a problem like this, or at
least gather enough information to enable someone with more expertise to
do so?

TIA.
-- 
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher                                        i.pilcher-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org
========================================================================



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-02  7:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-31  9:58 Plea for help Yu, Luming
     [not found] ` <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C66-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2004-01-01 16:54   ` Ian Pilcher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-02  7:34 Yu, Luming
2003-12-24  6:04 Yu, Luming
     [not found] ` <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C53-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-29 23:17   ` Ian Pilcher
2003-12-19  5:41 Ian Pilcher
     [not found] ` <3FE28F79.601-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-19 14:28   ` Micha Feigin
2003-12-21  1:45   ` Micha Feigin
     [not found] ` <3FE33B69.1010606@netspace.org>
     [not found]   ` <3FE33B69.1010606-ooduxAEi7gVg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-20  0:05     ` Ian Pilcher
     [not found]       ` <3FE39231.4040003-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-20  0:09         ` Randy.Dunlap
     [not found]           ` <20031219160947.79c3fcdf.rddunlap-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-20  1:09             ` Ian Pilcher
     [not found]               ` <3FE3A142.90407-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-20  2:40                 ` Randy.Dunlap
     [not found]                   ` <20031219184043.3983572d.rddunlap-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-20 19:47                     ` Ian Pilcher
     [not found]                       ` <3FE4A740.4080701-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-21  2:08                         ` Randy.Dunlap
     [not found]                           ` <20031220180854.32e2f56d.rddunlap-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>
2003-12-22  1:19                             ` Ian Pilcher

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox