Re: ASL fixing questions

Martijn Pieters
2004-02-12T17:24:23Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --]

Martijn Pieters wrote:
> Okay, I decompiled the SSDT table by hand (small table anyway), find it
> attached (really!). It doates indeed define the _PPC field and two other
> names, which make little sense to me.
>
> Which leads to my next question: I thought leading underscore names were
> reserved by the ACPI spec. ACPI 1.0 doesn't define the names, and ACPI
> 2.0 defines them differently. Can this lead to problems with the Linux
> ACPI implementation making assumptions about ACPI 1.0 code with 2.0
> extensions?

Strike that; I misremembered the ACPI 2.0 spec; these fields are indeed
ACPI 2.0 Processor fields.