-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

on 02/18/04 08:52, Andre Messerschmidt wrote:
> I don't have any errors if I use my DSDT. See the attached output from
dmesg
> for how it looks here with a 2.4.21.
yes, I saw, and this is the same I'd like to have. Anyway, I forgot to
advise that I upgraded to the new BIOS (0205A.001) and so maybe this is
a problem or cause something strange. I even tried a kernel-2.4.21 +
ACPI-20030619 + 'ACPI DSDT in initrd', but nothing changed, so maybe the
problem in my case is different.

Just to avoid mistackes: can you attach you customized compiled DSDT?
I'll give it a try and report the results.

> I reckon that you are right with your assumption that the new DSDT
table is
> not used, but I don't know why, since I have no insights in  ACPI.
Another strange thing is this one: as I reported in my first post, the
DSDT I've in /proc/acpi/dsdt if I boot with your customized compiled
DSDT and you customized DSDT are different. I mean:
- - ./iasl -c [your DSDT].dsl
- - cp DSDT.aml /boot/
- - reboot
- - cat /proc/acpi/dsdt > 2.6.2-initrd.dat
- - ./iasl -d 2.6.2-initrd.dat
- - diff [your DSDT].dsl 2.6.2-initrd.dsl > andre_luca.diff (attached)

As I wrote in the last post, I'll try to correct the new DSDT from BIOS
0205A.001: it has just 5 errors, so maybe there're good improvements.
Anyway, as above, I'd like to try your DSDT in .aml format, compiled by
you, if you could attach it.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAM0hzVAp7Xm10JmkRAhVmAJ9X+R49FMnhQtMFDXmc9f2K3Izw4wCeLpNl
c9gw1mApcLxO+0y80ik4BlU=
=ZH3O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----