From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Iain Lane <iain@orangesquash.org.uk>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:42:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <404044b2-8e7a-4420-9c10-b2ca75d7e3aa@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230816204143.66281-4-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On 8/16/2023 1:41 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> There is no reason for the variables to be pre-incremented.
> No intended functional changes.
>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
I think you need to explain bit more in commit log. Otherwise, looks good.
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> index ce62e61a9605e..7711dde68947f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> @@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints_amd(void)
> acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle,
> "LPI: constraints list begin:\n");
>
> - for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
> + for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
> union acpi_object *info_obj = &package->package.elements[j];
> struct lpi_device_constraint_amd dev_info = {};
> struct lpi_constraints *list;
> acpi_status status;
>
> - for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; ++k) {
> + for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; k++) {
> union acpi_object *obj = &info_obj->package.elements[k];
>
> list = &lpi_constraints_table[lpi_constraints_table_size];
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
> if (!package)
> continue;
>
> - for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
> + for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
> union acpi_object *element =
> &(package->package.elements[j]);
>
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
>
> constraint->min_dstate = -1;
>
> - for (j = 0; j < package_count; ++j) {
> + for (j = 0; j < package_count; j++) {
> union acpi_object *info_obj = &info.package[j];
> union acpi_object *cnstr_pkg;
> union acpi_object *obj;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 20:41 [PATCH v12 0/9] Fix wakeup problems on some AMD platforms Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 1/9] ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef statements Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 22:36 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 2/9] ACPI: Adjust #ifdef for *_lps0_dev use Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 22:38 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 3/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints Mario Limonciello
2023-08-17 2:42 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2023-08-17 10:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-17 15:28 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-08-17 15:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 4/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Catch multiple ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE objects Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 5/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Fix a logic error parsing AMD constraints table Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 6/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add more debugging for AMD constraints parsing Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 7/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Store if constraint is enabled Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 8/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add for_each_lpi_constraint() helper Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 20:41 ` [PATCH v12 9/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Enforce LPS0 constraints for PCI devices Mario Limonciello
2023-08-17 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-17 19:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-17 19:30 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-17 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-17 19:40 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-17 19:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-17 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=404044b2-8e7a-4420-9c10-b2ca75d7e3aa@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iain@orangesquash.org.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox