* ASUS M6800N: problem when removing 'ac' module
@ 2004-03-20 11:10 Luca Capello
[not found] ` <405C26C2.70603-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luca Capello @ 2004-03-20 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ML ACPI-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm on '2.6.5-rc1 + ACPI DSDT in initrd + eciadsl USB patch' and I get this
message when I 'rmmod ac' or 'modprobe -r ac':
=====
Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
Call Trace:
[<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
[<e20df328>] acpi_ac_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [ac]
[<e20df5e9>] acpi_ac_remove+0x86/0xa5 [ac]
[<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd
[<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93
[<e20df63d>] cleanup_module+0x35/0x55 [ac]
[<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
[<c014905a>] do_munmap+0x13a/0x180
[<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
[<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
=====
and the AC state in the 'GNOME Battery Applet' isn't updated (it still shows I'm
on AC mode).
Please let me know if I should post in the kernel bug database.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAXCbCVAp7Xm10JmkRApXMAJ9DhI7FO2medMeeLMW2hCS2EW15pgCeLm38
0PdFm/YqotMnbnzj7oKh69E=
=zx7S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <405C26C2.70603-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: ASUS M6800N: problem when removing 'ac' module [not found] ` <405C26C2.70603-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org> @ 2004-03-20 12:26 ` Luca Capello 2004-03-23 21:44 ` Luca Capello 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Luca Capello @ 2004-03-20 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ML ACPI-devel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, on 03/20/04 12:10, Luca Capello wrote: > I'm on '2.6.5-rc1 + ACPI DSDT in initrd + eciadsl USB patch' and I get this > message when I 'rmmod ac' or 'modprobe -r ac': actually, this happens with all ACPI modules: ===== Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e20df328>] acpi_ac_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [ac] [<e20df5e9>] acpi_ac_remove+0x86/0xa5 [ac] [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e20df63d>] cleanup_module+0x35/0x55 [ac] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c014905a>] do_munmap+0x13a/0x180 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e2177eb5>] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [battery] [<e2178185>] acpi_battery_remove+0x86/0xa5 [battery] [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e21781d9>] acpi_battery_exit+0x35/0x55 [battery] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e2177eb5>] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [battery] [<e2178185>] acpi_battery_remove+0x86/0xa5 [battery] [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e21781d9>] acpi_battery_exit+0x35/0x55 [battery] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e2212c1a>] acpi_thermal_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [thermal] [<e22130a4>] acpi_thermal_remove+0xce/0xea [thermal] [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e22130f5>] acpi_thermal_exit+0x35/0x55 [thermal] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e2204561>] acpi_processor_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [processor] [<e2204abc>] acpi_processor_remove+0x96/0xc3 [processor] [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e2204b8f>] acpi_processor_exit+0x3f/0x5f [processor] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e218d865>] acpi_button_exit+0x45/0x55 [button] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e216e861>] asus_acpi_exit+0x1d/0x2a [asus_acpi] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb ===== Please take care that it doesn't happen with other modules (like 'ehci_hcd' or 'joydev'). Solutions? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAXDhhVAp7Xm10JmkRAhABAJ44Z2VbSQgZN9zxS/Bzl16s67CmEACfa+PA GCw83WzhvIBLpfJoIuh7qjI= =FMOT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ASUS M6800N: problem when removing 'ac' module [not found] ` <405C26C2.70603-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org> 2004-03-20 12:26 ` Luca Capello @ 2004-03-23 21:44 ` Luca Capello 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Luca Capello @ 2004-03-23 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ML ACPI-devel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, on 03/20/04 12:10, Luca Capello wrote: > I'm on '2.6.5-rc1 + ACPI DSDT in initrd + eciadsl USB patch' [...] some more infos: - - I don't have oops on kernel 2.6.4 + ACPI 20040311 - - I've oops on 2.6.5-rc1 (no ACPI patches) and 2.6.5-rc2 (no ACPI patches) Maybe it should help... Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAYK/JVAp7Xm10JmkRAmOlAJ4pSnIDwtFfpipFSVCM2HdaWdh1iwCfS+G+ OQ8Z0rr34HjUPRqCt0INtn0= =twyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: ASUS M6800N: problem when removing 'ac' module
@ 2004-03-22 2:04 Li, Shaohua
[not found] ` <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD803300B9D-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Li, Shaohua @ 2004-03-22 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luca Capello; +Cc: ML ACPI-devel
Hi,
Please let me know if below patch helps.
Thanks,
David
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c 8 Jan 2004 10:39:37 -0000 1.1.1.2
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c 17 Jan 2004 01:34:23 -0000
@@ -311,8 +311,10 @@ static int acpi_driver_detach(struct acp
struct acpi_device * dev = container_of(node,struct
acpi_device,g_list);
if (dev->driver == drv) {
+ spin_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
if (drv->ops.remove)
drv->ops.remove(dev,ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_NORMAL);
+ spin_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
dev->driver = NULL;
dev->driver_data = NULL;
atomic_dec(&drv->references);
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org [mailto:acpi-devel-
> admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Luca Capello
> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 8:26 PM
> To: ML ACPI-devel
> Subject: Re: [ACPI] ASUS M6800N: problem when removing 'ac' module
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> on 03/20/04 12:10, Luca Capello wrote:
> > I'm on '2.6.5-rc1 + ACPI DSDT in initrd + eciadsl USB patch' and I
get
> this
> > message when I 'rmmod ac' or 'modprobe -r ac':
> actually, this happens with all ACPI modules:
> =====
> Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
> Call Trace:
> [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
> [<e20df328>] acpi_ac_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [ac]
> [<e20df5e9>] acpi_ac_remove+0x86/0xa5 [ac]
> [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd
> [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93
> [<e20df63d>] cleanup_module+0x35/0x55 [ac]
> [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
> [<c014905a>] do_munmap+0x13a/0x180
> [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
> [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
> Call Trace:
> [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
> [<e2177eb5>] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [battery]
> [<e2178185>] acpi_battery_remove+0x86/0xa5 [battery]
> [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd
> [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93
> [<e21781d9>] acpi_battery_exit+0x35/0x55 [battery]
> [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
> [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
> [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
> Call Trace:
> [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
> [<e2177eb5>] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [battery]
> [<e2178185>] acpi_battery_remove+0x86/0xa5 [battery]
> [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd
> [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93
> [<e21781d9>] acpi_battery_exit+0x35/0x55 [battery]
> [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
> [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
> [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
> Call Trace:
> [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
> [<e2212c1a>] acpi_thermal_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [thermal]
> [<e22130a4>] acpi_thermal_remove+0xce/0xea [thermal]
> [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd
> [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93
> [<e22130f5>] acpi_thermal_exit+0x35/0x55 [thermal]
> [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
> [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
> [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
> Call Trace:
> [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
> [<e2204561>] acpi_processor_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [processor]
> [<e2204abc>] acpi_processor_remove+0x96/0xc3 [processor]
> [<c02e920a>] acpi_driver_detach+0x64/0xbd
> [<c02e9352>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93
> [<e2204b8f>] acpi_processor_exit+0x3f/0x5f [processor]
> [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
> [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
> [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
> Call Trace:
> [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
> [<e218d865>] acpi_button_exit+0x45/0x55 [button]
> [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
> [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
> [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664
> Call Trace:
> [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160
> [<e216e861>] asus_acpi_exit+0x1d/0x2a [asus_acpi]
> [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170
> [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70
> [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> =====
>
> Please take care that it doesn't happen with other modules (like
> 'ehci_hcd' or
> 'joydev').
>
> Solutions?
>
> Thx, bye,
> Gismo / Luca
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFAXDhhVAp7Xm10JmkRAhABAJ44Z2VbSQgZN9zxS/Bzl16s67CmEACfa+PA
> GCw83WzhvIBLpfJoIuh7qjI=
> =FMOT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD803300B9D-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: ASUS M6800N: problem when removing 'ac' module [not found] ` <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD803300B9D-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> @ 2004-03-23 12:00 ` Luca Capello 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Luca Capello @ 2004-03-23 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ML ACPI-devel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, on 03/22/04 03:04, Li, Shaohua wrote: > Please let me know if below patch helps. I applied the patch: ===== gismo:/usr/src# cd linux-2.6.5-rc1-initrd-eciadsl-acpi.scan.c/ gismo:/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-rc1-initrd-eciadsl-acpi.scan.c# cp /boot/config-2.6.5-rc1 .config cp: overwrite `.config'? y `/boot/config-2.6.5-rc1' -> `.config' gismo:/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-rc1-initrd-eciadsl-acpi.scan.c# patch -p1 < ../kernel/v2.6/acpi-scan.c.diff patching file drivers/acpi/scan.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 311 with fuzz 1. ===== I compiled/installed the new kernel, but I got the same error (module unloaded in this order > ac, asus_acpi, battery, button, fan, thermal, processor): ===== Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e114f328>] acpi_ac_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [ac] [<e114f5e9>] acpi_ac_remove+0x86/0xa5 [ac] [<c02e9223>] acpi_driver_detach+0x7d/0xdd [<c02e9372>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e114f63d>] cleanup_module+0x35/0x55 [ac] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c014905a>] do_munmap+0x13a/0x180 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e1156861>] asus_acpi_exit+0x1d/0x2a [asus_acpi] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e11beeb5>] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [battery] [<e11bf185>] acpi_battery_remove+0x86/0xa5 [battery] [<c02e9223>] acpi_driver_detach+0x7d/0xdd [<c02e9372>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e11bf1d9>] acpi_battery_exit+0x35/0x55 [battery] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e11beeb5>] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [battery] [<e11bf185>] acpi_battery_remove+0x86/0xa5 [battery] [<c02e9223>] acpi_driver_detach+0x7d/0xdd [<c02e9372>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e11bf1d9>] acpi_battery_exit+0x35/0x55 [battery] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e116c865>] acpi_button_exit+0x45/0x55 [button] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e1230c1a>] acpi_thermal_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [thermal] [<e12310a4>] acpi_thermal_remove+0xce/0xea [thermal] [<c02e9223>] acpi_driver_detach+0x7d/0xdd [<c02e9372>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e12310f5>] acpi_thermal_exit+0x35/0x55 [thermal] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:664 Call Trace: [<c0182b4c>] remove_proc_entry+0x11c/0x160 [<e121f561>] acpi_processor_remove_fs+0x49/0x6d [processor] [<e121fabc>] acpi_processor_remove+0x96/0xc3 [processor] [<c02e9223>] acpi_driver_detach+0x7d/0xdd [<c02e9372>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x93 [<e121fb8f>] acpi_processor_exit+0x3f/0x5f [processor] [<c01326fb>] sys_delete_module+0x12b/0x170 [<c01490e3>] sys_munmap+0x43/0x70 [<c010935b>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb ===== > Thanks, Your welcome, please let me know if I should make other tests. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAYCbMVAp7Xm10JmkRArCqAJ43xrBTRNPuMP/n2f83ABmfh1P2CQCfdi8o Tpwpvjt0zB9bFh+/T1lIUUA= =hTpi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-23 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-20 11:10 ASUS M6800N: problem when removing 'ac' module Luca Capello
[not found] ` <405C26C2.70603-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-20 12:26 ` Luca Capello
2004-03-23 21:44 ` Luca Capello
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-22 2:04 Li, Shaohua
[not found] ` <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD803300B9D-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-23 12:00 ` Luca Capello
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox