From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Capello Subject: Re: Badness in remove_proc_entry when 'rmmod battery' Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:32:27 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <40A886AB.4020002@pca.it> References: <6E0C289723A0564F9A8279E236E8565F07668DFA@pdsmsx402.pd.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6E0C289723A0564F9A8279E236E8565F07668DFA-4yWAQGcml64divtuJNk2fFDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: ML ACPI-devel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, on 05/17/04 08:58, Wang, Zhenyu Z wrote: > Pls, see http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2705 > Subject: [ACPI] Badness in remove_proc_entry when 'rmmod battery' > > This showed up in my logs today when rmmod'ing the battery module: > > Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:685 > Call Trace: > [] remove_proc_entry+0x10a/0x150 > [] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x1d/0x2d [battery] > [] acpi_battery_remove+0x32/0x41 [battery] > [] acpi_driver_detach+0x39/0x7c > [] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x12/0x51 > [] acpi_battery_exit+0xa/0x1e [battery] > [] sys_delete_module+0x13e/0x180 > [] do_munmap+0x14a/0x190 > [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > > Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:685 > Call Trace: > [] remove_proc_entry+0x10a/0x150 > [] acpi_battery_remove_fs+0x1d/0x2d [battery] > [] acpi_battery_remove+0x32/0x41 [battery] > [] acpi_driver_detach+0x39/0x7c > [] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x12/0x51 > [] acpi_battery_exit+0xa/0x1e [battery] > [] sys_delete_module+0x13e/0x180 > [] do_munmap+0x14a/0x190 > [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb problem already reported in the 'acpi-devel' mailing-list http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7591209 ATM it isn't solved in 2.6.6 (with no other ACPI patches). Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAqIarVAp7Xm10JmkRAiuuAJ9rtdLt55V6tX8Oc8SMzRgRBe8irQCeNDf1 bWhaoiZ3PL3Hp2UKH1lGhnw= =A0Jp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click