From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cam Subject: APM sleep vs. ACPI S3 sleep Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 18:11:16 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <40ACE6B4.4060408@mesias.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi APM sleep eg. when running linux 2.4 with the APM behaviour in the BIOS used to suspend the machine, the battery would last for a long time and the machine would be cold to the touch (ie it's at the ambient temperature). ACPI S3 sleep looks the same but the battery does not last long and the machine is warm to the touch. Has anyone else seen this behaviour? Is it possible that the machine is waking itself periodically or at a certain level of discharge? Is it possible to make the ACPI sleep deeper? -Cam -- camilo-Nk/s8sJ9yP7QXOPxS62xeg@public.gmane.org <-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click