* APM, ACPI and DPMS question
@ 2004-09-14 12:52 Jan Bernatik
[not found] ` <4146E980.8040501-nd92eFGgBBntwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Bernatik @ 2004-09-14 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ACPI Developers
Hi,
I'm studying ACPI, and I found that:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should also be aware of another little glitch I discovered. The
XFree86 server has an option for DPMS (Energy Star) features. The DPMS
can states can be one of standby, suspend, off or on. Since the 2.4.x
kernels cannot suspend to disk, this can cause problems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
source: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ACPI-HOWTO/daemons.html
I really doesn't understand this. I thought it's just about monitor
energy, so please could somebody just roughly explain this ?
thanks, have a nice day
Jan Bernatik
--
student VUT BRNO - FEEC / Czech Republic
http://www.feec.vutbr.cz
registered user no. 207163 using Debian
icq: 78209478
home: linuxdesktop.kn.vutbr.cz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: APM, ACPI and DPMS question
[not found] ` <4146E980.8040501-nd92eFGgBBntwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
@ 2004-09-16 1:51 ` Ow Mun Heng
2004-09-16 9:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-24 13:47 ` Stefan Seyfried
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ow Mun Heng @ 2004-09-16 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ACPI Developers
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 20:52, Jan Bernatik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm studying ACPI, and I found that:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You should also be aware of another little glitch I discovered. The
> XFree86 server has an option for DPMS (Energy Star) features. The DPMS
> can states can be one of standby, suspend, off or on. Since the 2.4.x
> kernels cannot suspend to disk, this can cause problems.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
I may be mistaken but.. I think I managed to get a 2.4 kernel on RH9
days to suspend to disk properly.
DPMS also works. Perhaps someone else can remember it much better.
> source: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ACPI-HOWTO/daemons.html
>
> I really doesn't understand this. I thought it's just about monitor
> energy, so please could somebody just roughly explain this ?
>
> thanks, have a nice day
>
> Jan Bernatik
--
Ow Mun Heng
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel
2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive
Neuromancer 09:50:41 up 1 day, 34 min, 7 users, load average: 1.83,
1.21, 1.19
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: APM, ACPI and DPMS question
[not found] ` <4146E980.8040501-nd92eFGgBBntwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
2004-09-16 1:51 ` Ow Mun Heng
@ 2004-09-16 9:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-24 13:47 ` Stefan Seyfried
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nigel Cunningham @ 2004-09-16 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Bernatik; +Cc: ACPI Developers
Hi.
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 22:52, Jan Bernatik wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You should also be aware of another little glitch I discovered. The
> XFree86 server has an option for DPMS (Energy Star) features. The DPMS
> can states can be one of standby, suspend, off or on. Since the 2.4.x
> kernels cannot suspend to disk, this can cause problems.
Suspend2 is available for 2.4 kernels; it doesn't need ACPI or APM
support. You're right in thinking that the issues of whether
suspend-to-{ram,disk} is supported is completely independent of DPMS. It
appears that the author of that page was confused.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Pastoral Worker
Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong
PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901
Many today claim to be tolerant. True tolerance, however, can cope with others
being intolerant.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: APM, ACPI and DPMS question
[not found] ` <4146E980.8040501-nd92eFGgBBntwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
2004-09-16 1:51 ` Ow Mun Heng
2004-09-16 9:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
@ 2004-09-24 13:47 ` Stefan Seyfried
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Seyfried @ 2004-09-24 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:52:16PM +0200, Jan Bernatik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm studying ACPI, and I found that:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You should also be aware of another little glitch I discovered. The
> XFree86 server has an option for DPMS (Energy Star) features. The DPMS
> can states can be one of standby, suspend, off or on. Since the 2.4.x
> kernels cannot suspend to disk, this can cause problems.
suspend to disk has nothing to do with DPMS at all.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> source: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ACPI-HOWTO/daemons.html
well, this document is simply plain wrong in this regard.
> I really doesn't understand this. I thought it's just about monitor
> energy, so please could somebody just roughly explain this ?
DPMS is monitor "standby", "suspend" and "off". It has nothing to do with
system power management, ACPI, APM or suspend to disk / RAM.
Maybe you shold write the author of the ACPI-HOWTO and tell him.
--
Stefan Seyfried
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-24 13:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-14 12:52 APM, ACPI and DPMS question Jan Bernatik
[not found] ` <4146E980.8040501-nd92eFGgBBntwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
2004-09-16 1:51 ` Ow Mun Heng
2004-09-16 9:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-24 13:47 ` Stefan Seyfried
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox