From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: giupil <giupil-nznwD2ikctv02BlrwmTdfg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Aspire 1511LMI - Aspire 1513LMI DSDT
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:36:35 +0000
Message-ID: <41A1F973.7060700@aliceposta.it>
References: <419E5183.6030405@aliceposta.it> <20041119200129.GG31422@poupinou.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041119200129.GG31422-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel>,
	<mailto:acpi-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acpi-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel>,
	<mailto:acpi-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=acpi-devel>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

Hi Bruno,

I'm sorry for my ignorance, I'm not a expert. I'm very gratefull for 
your notes.
The only problem that still remains in my mind is:

   In
  
   http://acpi.sourceforge.net/dsdt/tables/ACER/Aspire_1513LMi/-
   ACER-Aspire_1513LMi-unknown_bios-custom.asl.gz
  
   at the line 3893 of the ACER-Aspire_1513LMi-unknown_bios-custom.dsl 
decompiled file, I
   find:

                    Return (Package (0x02)
                    {
                            Zero,
                            Zero
                     })

    but at the 
http://casteyde.christian.free.fr/laptop/LinuxOnAspire1511LMi.html in the
    dsdt_asp1511.asl at the line 3895, I find:


                    Return (0x00)

    These corrections are about the warnig:

    mydsdt_orig.dsl  3865:                     Method (DRUL, 1, 
NotSerialized)
    Warning  2019 -                              ^ Not all control paths 
return a value (DRUL)

    Is there anyone who know the difference between the two solutions
    and which is the better solution?

Bye Giuseppe


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/