From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Borgia Subject: Re: powernow & ACPI & 2.6.9 Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 22:15:26 +0100 Message-ID: <41CDD86E.1010905@cs.unibo.it> References: <20041119083851.GB2908@mithrandir.dakordnet.org> <20041119085900.GD31422@poupinou.org> <41BCB4D4.3050109@cs.unibo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <41BCB4D4.3050109-iEixELS/QsY1GQ1Ptb7lUw@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Andrea Borgia wrote: > Bruno Ducrot wrote: >> Could you please test those patches: >> http://www.poupinou.org/cpufreq/powernow-k7/recalibrate_cpu_khz/powernow-k7.recalibrate-cpu_khz.diff >> and >> http://www.poupinou.org/cpufreq/powernow-k7/recalibrate_cpu_khz/timers-recalibrate_cpu_khz.diff > > I've just tried 2.6.10-rc3, that still has the same "weird speed" > problem as 2.6.9, and I'm glad to report that those two patches apply > cleanly and fix the problem in this case too. Ditto for 2.6.10 BR, Andrea. -- Homepage: http://andrea.borgia.bo.it / Amateur radio: IZ4FHT A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/