From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lorenzo Colitti Subject: Re: Writing caches Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:39:28 +0100 Message-ID: <422DC730.4090201@colitti.com> References: <20050308101229.GD4154@pico.ruhr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050308101229.GD4154-Q4Z/ui9EqVxM7kwft8N7nw@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Stefan Tomanek Cc: ACPI List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Stefan Tomanek wrote: > Just a small question, maybe I got a completely false impression... > Why does software suspend have to save file cachess? Couldn't they just > be flushed to save suspend and restore time? If you write the caches to disk on suspend and re-read them on resume, the machine is much more responsive when it comes back on. At least for me, that's much better. :) Cheers, Lorenzo ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click