From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rich Townsend Subject: Re: acpi_sbs with kernel 2.6.11 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:44:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4230E9E9.2010600@bartol.udel.edu> References: <75eeb70e0503092013562a05d@mail.gmail.com> <75eeb70e05030921185b337dd2@mail.gmail.com> <4230A2BD.6090609@bartol.udel.edu> <1110500644.8136.1.camel@tyrosine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <1110500644.8136.1.camel@tyrosine> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Matthew Garrett Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 14:40 -0500, Rich Townsend wrote: > > >>Not at the moment. I'm still trying to work out a coherent approach to >>bringing together Control Method and Smart batteries under the same code >>framework. > > > hal has recently gained the ability to parse control method battery > status. Adding support for smart batteries is trivial. There's no need > to unite battery status at the kernel level, especially since we'll need > to support apm and pmu batteries as well. > So I should instead be looking to implementing the SBS stuff in the HAL? Sounds good to me. Where's the main site for the HAL work? cheers, Rich ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click