From: "François Valenduc" <fvalenduc-IWqWACnzNjyZIoH1IeqzKA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Re: What's up with the Embedded Controller driver? [was Re: [ACPI] patched sms-cm acpi/ec.c to 2.6.11.5]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:37:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4242DEAC.6040900@tiscali.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F84041AC159@pdsmsx403>
You mean the acpi-20050309-2.6.11 patch ? I tried it but I get rejects
on the KConfig file. Nevertheless the kernel seems to compile correctly.
I have tried it and I don't notice big changes. However I already said
that I don't encounter the problem mentionned by Rich Townsend when I
use his DSDT patches (lost interrupts, keypresses not taken into
account). There is sometime a slight but perceivable slowdown when I hit
the same key repeatedly (aad it occours only with some programs).
François Valenduc
Yu, Luming a écrit :
>Do you try latest acpi testing patch?
>It includes patch filed at http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3851
>
>
>Thanks
>Luming
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>>[mailto:acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of
>>Fran?ois Valenduc
>>Sent: 2005年3月24日 3:35
>>To: Rich Townsend
>>Cc: Pedro Venda; acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>>Subject: [ACPI] Re: What's up with the Embedded Controller
>>driver? [was Re: [ACPI] patched sms-cm acpi/ec.c to 2.6.11.5]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>it does NOT seem ok. after some more tests with the patch, I found
>>>>>out that francois was right about most of the problems:
>>>>>* timeout on boot, just after the boot loader. this is very
>>>>>confusing to me...
>>>>>* when I plug in the battery, it takes ages to show information
>>>>>about it... more than 1 minute.
>>>>>* about the usb problems, apparently I wasn't affected.
>>>>>
>>>>>could you please tip us about what could be causing these delays?
>>>>>especially the boot delay... it really puzzles my mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>regards,
>>>>>pedro venda.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Concerning USB problems, I think it happens because I tried
>>>>
>>>>
>>the patch
>>
>>
>>>>with the 2.6.11 kernel. I have retried with the 2.6.11.5 and there
>>>>are no more USB problems. But all the other problems remains.
>>>>Concerning the timeout on boot, could it be caused by the
>>>>acpi-dsdt-initrd patch made by Markus Gaugausch. Maybe we
>>>>
>>>>
>>should try
>>
>>
>>>>other ways to incorporate the DSDT to the kernel.
>>>>François Valenduc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I doubt it is the DSDT patch; rather, it looks like
>>>
>>>
>>something has gone
>>
>>
>>>wrong in the embedded controller driver in going from 2.6.10 to
>>>2.6.11. I've tried out a number of different ways of fixing
>>>
>>>
>>ec event
>>
>>
>>>handling, including my own spinlock kludge and Pedro's
>>>
>>>
>>version of it,
>>
>>
>>>and also a series of patches by Dmitry Torokhov; but all of
>>>
>>>
>>them seem
>>
>>
>>>to have problems with very sluggish EC response and/or EC timeouts
>>>(indicated by "Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_TIME").
>>>
>>>Who currently maintains ec.c? And what exactly has been done to it
>>>since 2.6.10?
>>>
>>>cheers,
>>>
>>>Rich
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Just by curiosity I tried the DSDT patches without applying
>>any patch on
>>the ec.c file and I don't notice any problem yet. I choose for
>>a static
>>DSDT override and there doesn't seem to be any slowdown of my
>>computer.
>>If I have well understood I could see "Handler for [EmbeddedControl]
>>returned AE_TIME" appearing in kernel messages but it doesn't appear.
>>Maybe I am very lucky!
>>
>>François
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded
>>DevCon 2005
>>Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
>>Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications &
>>content. Register
>>by 3/29 & save $300
>>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6883&alloc_id=15149&op=click
>>_______________________________________________
>>Acpi-devel mailing list
>>Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
>>
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded DevCon 2005
Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications & content. Register
by 3/29 & save $300 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6883&alloc_id=15149&op=click
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-24 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-24 14:18 Re: What's up with the Embedded Controller driver? [was Re: [ACPI] patched sms-cm acpi/ec.c to 2.6.11.5] Yu, Luming
2005-03-24 15:37 ` François Valenduc [this message]
2005-03-28 0:01 ` Rich Townsend
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-24 16:02 Yu, Luming
[not found] <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F84041AC15D@pdsmsx403>
2005-03-24 19:40 ` François Valenduc
2005-03-25 1:23 Yu, Luming
2005-03-29 2:22 Yu, Luming
2005-03-29 14:50 ` Rich Townsend
2005-03-29 15:01 Yu, Luming
2005-03-29 15:09 ` Rich Townsend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4242DEAC.6040900@tiscali.be \
--to=fvalenduc-iwqwacnznjyzioh1ieqzka@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox