* Compal EFL30 ACPI
@ 2005-09-06 15:54 Dow_Hurst
[not found] ` <14569678.1126022061410.JavaMail.root-l98S9+yXcW0EnThS6yfqI2T5tvvlLVcNFbm1WkIHI0jR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dow_Hurst @ 2005-09-06 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
I have a rather new laptop from Compal called an EFL30. I've noticed that ACPI seems pretty well supported in SUSE 9.3 running the 2.6.11 kernel. I do have some mouse timing issues but haven't proceeded very far in trying out fixes such as fiddling with the battery status check timings. I have been able to suspend to RAM based on closing the lid. I have not yet tried suspend to disk. No thermal stats are available. The battery reports status and will warn me in a shell when at a low battery state that I can specify. I've tried XP just to see the dark side and their really isn't alot of difference. The mouse issue and thermal control are probably the most useful fixes I'd like to work out. I did see that the CPU under XP was running at ~750MHz instead of 1.86GHz. I am pretty sure this doesn't happen under SUSE 9.3.
What type of info would be helpful to post so this laptop can be more fully supported? Just extract the DSDT and post it?
Any advice on fixing the current timing and CPU control issues?
Thanks,
Dow
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread[parent not found: <14569678.1126022061410.JavaMail.root-l98S9+yXcW0EnThS6yfqI2T5tvvlLVcNFbm1WkIHI0jR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <14569678.1126022061410.JavaMail.root-l98S9+yXcW0EnThS6yfqI2T5tvvlLVcNFbm1WkIHI0jR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2005-09-06 16:29 ` foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w [not found] ` <20050906162919.31864.qmail-ZDCUxwME616A/QwVtaZbd3CJp6faPEW9@public.gmane.org> 2005-09-07 9:21 ` Bruno Ducrot 2005-09-07 11:16 ` Thomas Renninger 2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w @ 2005-09-06 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dow_Hurst, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f --- Dow_Hurst <dhurst-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@public.gmane.org> wrote: > I'd like to work out. I did see that the CPU under XP was running at > ~750MHz instead of 1.86GHz. I am pretty sure this doesn't happen > under SUSE 9.3. Right. That's probably a sign that you do not have the 2.6.xx cpufreq CPU speed adjustment drivers present in that SuSE kernel of yours. If you enable AMD PowerNow / Intel SpeedStep cpufreq drivers, this problem will go away. Then, if you want to control the speed, download cpufreqd, which will let you set up everything just exactly how you want it using cpufreqd.conf. > Thanks, > Dow HTH! ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20050906162919.31864.qmail-ZDCUxwME616A/QwVtaZbd3CJp6faPEW9@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <20050906162919.31864.qmail-ZDCUxwME616A/QwVtaZbd3CJp6faPEW9@public.gmane.org> @ 2005-09-07 8:33 ` Erik Slagter [not found] ` <1126081987.19250.17.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> 2005-09-09 19:21 ` Stefan Seyfried 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Erik Slagter @ 2005-09-07 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w Cc: Dow_Hurst, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --] On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 09:29 -0700, foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > --- Dow_Hurst <dhurst-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > I'd like to work out. I did see that the CPU under XP was running at > > ~750MHz instead of 1.86GHz. I am pretty sure this doesn't happen > > under SUSE 9.3. > > Right. That's probably a sign that you do not have the 2.6.xx cpufreq > CPU speed adjustment drivers present in that SuSE kernel of yours. If > you enable AMD PowerNow / Intel SpeedStep cpufreq drivers, this problem > will go away. Then, if you want to control the speed, download > cpufreqd, which will let you set up everything just exactly how you > want it using cpufreqd.conf. I was under the impression that the "acpi" cpufreq driver was preferable. [-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --] [-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 2115 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1126081987.19250.17.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <1126081987.19250.17.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> @ 2005-09-07 9:18 ` Bruno Ducrot [not found] ` <20050907091844.GA23635-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Bruno Ducrot @ 2005-09-07 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Erik Slagter Cc: foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w, Dow_Hurst, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:33:07AM +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 09:29 -0700, foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > > --- Dow_Hurst <dhurst-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > I'd like to work out. I did see that the CPU under XP was running at > > > ~750MHz instead of 1.86GHz. I am pretty sure this doesn't happen > > > under SUSE 9.3. > > > > Right. That's probably a sign that you do not have the 2.6.xx cpufreq > > CPU speed adjustment drivers present in that SuSE kernel of yours. If > > you enable AMD PowerNow / Intel SpeedStep cpufreq drivers, this problem > > will go away. Then, if you want to control the speed, download > > cpufreqd, which will let you set up everything just exactly how you > > want it using cpufreqd.conf. > > I was under the impression that the "acpi" cpufreq driver was > preferable. You were wrong. -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20050907091844.GA23635-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <20050907091844.GA23635-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> @ 2005-09-07 9:23 ` Erik Slagter [not found] ` <1126085038.19250.24.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Erik Slagter @ 2005-09-07 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno Ducrot Cc: foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w, Dow_Hurst, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 864 bytes --] On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:18 +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:33:07AM +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: > > > Right. That's probably a sign that you do not have the 2.6.xx cpufreq > > > CPU speed adjustment drivers present in that SuSE kernel of yours. If > > > you enable AMD PowerNow / Intel SpeedStep cpufreq drivers, this problem > > > will go away. Then, if you want to control the speed, download > > > cpufreqd, which will let you set up everything just exactly how you > > > want it using cpufreqd.conf. > > > > I was under the impression that the "acpi" cpufreq driver was > > preferable. > > You were wrong. Can please someone elaborate? I remember to have read that it's best to use the acpi method for frequency scaling, unless that's not available?! Also I suppose acpi knows best how to drive it's own hardware? [-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --] [-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 2115 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1126085038.19250.24.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <1126085038.19250.24.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> @ 2005-09-07 9:39 ` Bruno Ducrot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bruno Ducrot @ 2005-09-07 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Erik Slagter Cc: foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w, Dow_Hurst, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:23:58AM +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:18 +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:33:07AM +0200, Erik Slagter wrote: > > > > Right. That's probably a sign that you do not have the 2.6.xx cpufreq > > > > CPU speed adjustment drivers present in that SuSE kernel of yours. If > > > > you enable AMD PowerNow / Intel SpeedStep cpufreq drivers, this problem > > > > will go away. Then, if you want to control the speed, download > > > > cpufreqd, which will let you set up everything just exactly how you > > > > want it using cpufreqd.conf. > > > > > > I was under the impression that the "acpi" cpufreq driver was > > > preferable. > > > > You were wrong. > > Can please someone elaborate? > > I remember to have read that it's best to use the acpi method for > frequency scaling, unless that's not available?! Also I suppose acpi > knows best how to drive it's own hardware? The cpufreq ACPI IO driver use some ioports (as its name suggest) in order to perform p-state transition. Those ioports likely trigger an SMM trap which means that some propritary BIOS code will be run. It's fine to do so, but the problem is that there will be more latencies just to put the processor under SMM. It's also fine to do so on older platforms, since anyway the latency introduced by putting the processor in SMM will be low compared to the time taken for a transition. But this will become too high on, say, centrino platforms. Cheers, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <20050906162919.31864.qmail-ZDCUxwME616A/QwVtaZbd3CJp6faPEW9@public.gmane.org> 2005-09-07 8:33 ` Erik Slagter @ 2005-09-09 19:21 ` Stefan Seyfried 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Stefan Seyfried @ 2005-09-09 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:29:19AM -0700, foo_bar_baz_boo wrote: > > I'd like to work out. I did see that the CPU under XP was running at > > ~750MHz instead of 1.86GHz. I am pretty sure this doesn't happen > > under SUSE 9.3. > > Right. That's probably a sign that you do not have the 2.6.xx cpufreq > CPU speed adjustment drivers present in that SuSE kernel of yours. If No. This is all built as modules and works out of the box on most machines with SUSE 9.3. > you enable AMD PowerNow / Intel SpeedStep cpufreq drivers, this problem > will go away. Then, if you want to control the speed, download > cpufreqd, which will let you set up everything just exactly how you > want it using cpufreqd.conf. Or just use the installed powersaved which will do this just fine. No need to download anything. -- Stefan Seyfried ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <14569678.1126022061410.JavaMail.root-l98S9+yXcW0EnThS6yfqI2T5tvvlLVcNFbm1WkIHI0jR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> 2005-09-06 16:29 ` foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w @ 2005-09-07 9:21 ` Bruno Ducrot 2005-09-07 11:16 ` Thomas Renninger 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bruno Ducrot @ 2005-09-07 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dow_Hurst; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:54:20AM -0400, Dow_Hurst wrote: > I have a rather new laptop from Compal called an EFL30. I've noticed that ACPI seems pretty well supported in SUSE 9.3 running the 2.6.11 kernel. I do have some mouse timing issues but haven't proceeded very far in trying out fixes such as fiddling with the battery status check timings. I have been able to suspend to RAM based on closing the lid. I have not yet tried suspend to disk. No thermal stats are available. The battery reports status and will warn me in a shell when at a low battery state that I can specify. I've tried XP just to see the dark side and their really isn't alot of difference. The mouse issue and thermal control are probably the most useful fixes I'd like to work out. I did see that the CPU under XP was running at ~750MHz instead of 1.86GHz. I am pretty sure this doesn't happen under SUSE 9.3. > > What type of info would be helpful to post so this laptop can be more fully supported? Just extract the DSDT and post it? > > > Any advice on fixing the current timing and CPU control issues? > Not related to those problems, there are some supports for compal laptops via the omnibook kernel module at http://www.sf.net/projects/omke You may want to check if by chance that work for you. Cheers, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Compal EFL30 ACPI [not found] ` <14569678.1126022061410.JavaMail.root-l98S9+yXcW0EnThS6yfqI2T5tvvlLVcNFbm1WkIHI0jR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> 2005-09-06 16:29 ` foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w 2005-09-07 9:21 ` Bruno Ducrot @ 2005-09-07 11:16 ` Thomas Renninger 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Renninger @ 2005-09-07 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dow_Hurst; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Dow_Hurst wrote: ... > No thermal stats are available. ... That means /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/ is empty even thermal module is loaded? Could you send me acpidmp output, please or put it somewhere in the web and link to it? I have a machine with the same symptom, I wonder whether it's the same problem. > > What type of info would be helpful to post so this laptop can be more fully supported? Just extract the DSDT and post it? Hopefully. Thanks, Thomas ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-09 19:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-06 15:54 Compal EFL30 ACPI Dow_Hurst
[not found] ` <14569678.1126022061410.JavaMail.root-l98S9+yXcW0EnThS6yfqI2T5tvvlLVcNFbm1WkIHI0jR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2005-09-06 16:29 ` foo_bar_baz_boo-acpi-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w
[not found] ` <20050906162919.31864.qmail-ZDCUxwME616A/QwVtaZbd3CJp6faPEW9@public.gmane.org>
2005-09-07 8:33 ` Erik Slagter
[not found] ` <1126081987.19250.17.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2005-09-07 9:18 ` Bruno Ducrot
[not found] ` <20050907091844.GA23635-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2005-09-07 9:23 ` Erik Slagter
[not found] ` <1126085038.19250.24.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2005-09-07 9:39 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-09-09 19:21 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-09-07 9:21 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-09-07 11:16 ` Thomas Renninger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox