From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86/acpi: remove redundant logic of acpi memory hotadd
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:19:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4326596.xCAz7vOgOp@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC829233539DED4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 01:39:54 AM Liu, Jinsong wrote:
> Resend it, add Rafael and linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
I wonder what memory hotplug people think about that.
Thanks,
Rafael
> ===============
> From 1d39279e45c54ce531691da5ffe261e7689dd92c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:52:06 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] X86/acpi: remove redundant logic of acpi memory hotadd
>
> When memory hotadd, acpi_memory_enable_device has already been done
> at drv->ops.add (acpi_memory_device_add), no need to do it again
> at notify callback.
>
> At acpi_memory_enable_device, acpi_memory_get_device_resources
> is also a redundant action, since it has been done at drv->ops.add.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 17 -----------------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> index 24c807f..a6489fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> @@ -220,15 +220,6 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
> struct acpi_memory_info *info;
> int node;
>
> -
> - /* Get the range from the _CRS */
> - result = acpi_memory_get_device_resources(mem_device);
> - if (result) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "get_device_resources failed\n");
> - mem_device->state = MEMORY_INVALID_STATE;
> - return result;
> - }
> -
> node = acpi_get_node(mem_device->device->handle);
> /*
> * Tell the VM there is more memory here...
> @@ -357,14 +348,6 @@ static void acpi_memory_device_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (acpi_memory_check_device(mem_device))
> - break;
> -
> - if (acpi_memory_enable_device(mem_device)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Cannot enable memory device\n");
> - break;
> - }
> -
> ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS;
> break;
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 1:39 [PATCH] X86/acpi: remove redundant logic of acpi memory hotadd Liu, Jinsong
2012-12-06 15:58 ` Liu, Jinsong
2012-12-07 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-12-08 2:34 ` Wen Congyang
2012-12-12 14:37 ` Liu, Jinsong
2012-12-13 2:36 ` Jiang Liu
2012-12-13 11:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-13 13:22 ` Liu, Jinsong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4326596.xCAz7vOgOp@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=jinsong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox