Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap

Matthew Garrett
2005-12-08T14:52:57Z

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:33:53PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

> I would say your code belongs in the ACPI subtree. At most the core code
> wants to have the generic supporting functions for 'do a taskfile' and
> if need be to call an arch/platform resume function that any pm system
> can sensibly use.

How about the hotplug notification events?

> SCSI should not know detail about ACPI, APM or anything of that nature.

Hrm. I guess this can be implemented pretty much just by cutting and
pasting the code into drivers/acpi rather than drivers/scsi. Would that
be considered an improvement?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org