Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap

Jens Axboe
2005-12-09T12:07:31Z

On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 12:46 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote:
> > > I case this (still) isn't clear, I am addressing the attitude of "It's
> > > ACPI so it's not going to be used, period".
> >
> > The problem seems to be that you are misunderstanding the 'attitude',
> > which was mainly based on the initial patch sent out which stuffs acpi
> > directly in everywhere. That seems to be a good trigger for curt/direct
> > replies.
>
> This is the post I object to:
> [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113404894931377&w=2]

I would imagine, and that is what I'm explaining to you. Can we please
just let this die? Thanks.

--
Jens Axboe

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!