From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reuben Farrelly Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.15-mm3 [USB lost interrupt bug] Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:58:28 +1300 Message-ID: <43D1E9A4.8090504@reub.net> References: <43D1C4E9.7030901@reub.net> <20060120214723.79111715.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from tornado.reub.net ([202.89.145.182]:56999 "EHLO tornado.reub.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751094AbWAUH6j (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:58:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060120214723.79111715.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, greg@kroah.com, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 21/01/2006 6:47 p.m., Andrew Morton wrote: >> I've now done in excess of 20 reboots with this code and haven't had either >> problem show up at all. >> >> So for now I'll keep a record of things for a bit longer, but I guess I've >> reason to be fairly confident that both this USB/IRQ problem and my ATA/IRQ >> problem are now fixed. >> >> It does make me wonder if the ACPI update in rc1-mm2 fixed it, and was actually >> the cause of most of my problems......it would be nice to know for sure. > > We probably won't know. Did you ever test 2.6.16-rc1 plus 2.6.16-rc1-mm1's > acpi.patch? If that plays up we'd have confirmation. It has been OK over 15x reboots (just tested now). 2.6.16-rc1-mm1 wasn't the usual standard award winning release for me because of the reiserfs problems so I only booted into it once and ran it for a couple of hours before retreating to 2.6.15-rc1. Last *known* problematic release on that box was 2.6.15-mm4.