From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathieu_B=E9rard?= Subject: linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm2: new ACPI errors Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:31:27 +0100 Message-ID: <43D27DFF.2030104@crans.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.36]:3491 "EHLO smtp6-g19.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932232AbWAUSba (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:31:30 -0500 Received: from perenold.hd.free.fr (vbo91-2-82-239-207-88.fbx.proxad.net [82.239.207.88]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AB315833 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:31:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by perenold.hd.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95162753 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:31:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from perenold.hd.free.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (perenold.hd.free.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31516-10 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:31:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (manwe.beleriand.perenold.info [192.168.0.49]) by perenold.hd.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C16625C for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:31:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E6C1C010AB for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:31:28 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi, I've got 4 new ACPI errors during the boot sequence: ACPI: Subsystem revision 20060113 ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ... After some investigations it appears that the corresponding Pathname are _PR0, _PR1, _PR2 and _PR3 and are concerning the root node. There is no _PRx in my dsdt so this error has probably always existed but has been made visible by the switch from ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT to ACPI_REPORT_ERROR in the latest ACPI patch. Is this a real error ? Is it OK for my dsdt to lack these _PRx objects ? Thanks (this has already been reported some time ago: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112429158821875&w=2) (Please CC me)