From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@linux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:30:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EB8A3F.20303@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602071017430.12589@shark.he.net>
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:29:10PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> Identify which device is not power-manageable to make
>>> the message more useful.
>>
>>> --- linux-2615-rc6g4.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>>> +++ linux-2615-rc6g4/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>>> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ int acpi_bus_set_power(acpi_handle handl
>>>
>>> if (!device->flags.power_manageable) {
>>> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN,
>>> - "Device is not power manageable\n"));
>>> + "Device '%s' is not power manageable\n",
>>> + device->kobj.name));
>>
>> This is good information, but does it have to come in such a scary message?
>> It appears that something is wrong with the device, when in fact, it just
>> doesn't support an optional capability.
>>
>> Could we demote the message to e.g. ACPI_DB_INFO?
>
I already moved this one with the big debug to error/warn ... patch.
It should now be ACPI_DB_INFO, but I did not add the device name though...
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-07 3:29 [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-09 18:30 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43EB8A3F.20303@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox