* question on what is ejectable?
@ 2006-03-08 20:55 Kristen Accardi
2006-03-10 2:28 ` [Pcihpd-discuss] " Kenji Kaneshige
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kristen Accardi @ 2006-03-08 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi; +Cc: pcihpd-discuss
I notice in the acpi_bus_get_flags() function ejectable is defined as
anything that has either _EJ0 or _EJD. However, the acpi pci hotplug
driver defines an ejectable slot as being one which must have (among
other things) _EJ0. Is it legitimate to change the definition of an
ejectable slot to be one that has either _EJ0 or _EJD (in addition to
the other requirements for pci hotplug slots).
Kristen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] question on what is ejectable?
2006-03-08 20:55 question on what is ejectable? Kristen Accardi
@ 2006-03-10 2:28 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-14 11:06 ` MUNEDA Takahiro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kenji Kaneshige @ 2006-03-10 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kristen Accardi; +Cc: linux-acpi, pcihpd-discuss
Kristen Accardi wrote:
> I notice in the acpi_bus_get_flags() function ejectable is defined as
> anything that has either _EJ0 or _EJD. However, the acpi pci hotplug
> driver defines an ejectable slot as being one which must have (among
> other things) _EJ0. Is it legitimate to change the definition of an
> ejectable slot to be one that has either _EJ0 or _EJD (in addition to
> the other requirements for pci hotplug slots).
>
As the acpi_bus_get_flags() does, I think "ejectable device" is defined
as anything that has either _EJ0 or _EJD. But I don't think the device
is "ejectable slot" if it has _EJD but it doesn't have _EJ0. If an eject
request was notified to such devices, I don't know how to eject those.
I think one of the requirements for pci hotplug slots is having _EJ0.
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] question on what is ejectable?
2006-03-10 2:28 ` [Pcihpd-discuss] " Kenji Kaneshige
@ 2006-03-14 11:06 ` MUNEDA Takahiro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: MUNEDA Takahiro @ 2006-03-14 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kristen Accardi; +Cc: Kenji Kaneshige, linux-acpi, pcihpd-discuss
At Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:28:58 +0900,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Kristen Accardi wrote:
> > I notice in the acpi_bus_get_flags() function ejectable is defined as
> > anything that has either _EJ0 or _EJD. However, the acpi pci hotplug
> > driver defines an ejectable slot as being one which must have (among
> > other things) _EJ0. Is it legitimate to change the definition of an
> > ejectable slot to be one that has either _EJ0 or _EJD (in addition to
> > the other requirements for pci hotplug slots).
> >
>
> As the acpi_bus_get_flags() does, I think "ejectable device" is defined
> as anything that has either _EJ0 or _EJD. But I don't think the device
> is "ejectable slot" if it has _EJD but it doesn't have _EJ0. If an eject
> request was notified to such devices, I don't know how to eject those.
> I think one of the requirements for pci hotplug slots is having _EJ0.
I agree with Kenji's opinion.
I also worry about that if an eject request is raised on the
_EJD defined device.
Thank,
MUNE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-14 11:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-08 20:55 question on what is ejectable? Kristen Accardi
2006-03-10 2:28 ` [Pcihpd-discuss] " Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-14 11:06 ` MUNEDA Takahiro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).