From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kenji Kaneshige Subject: Re: [2/2] ACPI: report "Module Device" support via _OSI Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:34:35 +0900 Message-ID: <4445D9FB.100@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <200604181558.55296.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:22981 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbWDSGgm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 02:36:42 -0400 Received: from m7.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.77]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id k3J6ae33031532 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:36:40 +0900 (envelope-from kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by m7.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.12.10/Fujitsu Domain Master) id k3J6adoG024305 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:36:40 +0900 (envelope-from kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com) Received: from s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s5 [127.0.0.1]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB42A1B805E for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:36:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from fjm503.ms.jp.fujitsu.com (fjm503.ms.jp.fujitsu.com [10.56.99.77]) by s5.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CAD1B805B for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:36:39 +0900 (JST) Received: from fjmscan503.ms.jp.fujitsu.com (fjmscan503.ms.jp.fujitsu.com [10.56.99.143])by fjm503.ms.jp.fujitsu.com with ESMTP id k3J6aVgA001305 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:36:32 +0900 In-Reply-To: <200604181558.55296.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "Moore, Robert" , Anil S Keshavamurthy , Keiichiro Tokunaga , Motoyuki Ito Hi, I have a question. The ACPI container driver can be build as a kernel module. Should _OSI("Module Device") returns TRUE even when container driver module is not loaded? (Typically, _OSI is evaluated at _INI time, I think. So container driver module is not loaded at _OSI("Module Device") time anyway.) Thanks, Kenji Kaneshige Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Update _OSI strings to report that "Module Device" is supported. > > This is Linux-specific, so it should be one of the Linux divergences > from the Intel ACPI CA. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > Index: work-mm5/drivers/acpi/utilities/uteval.c > =================================================================== > --- work-mm5.orig/drivers/acpi/utilities/uteval.c 2006-04-18 15:31:22.000000000 -0600 > +++ work-mm5/drivers/acpi/utilities/uteval.c 2006-04-18 15:32:38.000000000 -0600 > @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ > /* Feature Group Strings */ > > "Extended Address Space Descriptor", > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER > + "Module Device", > +#endif > }; > > /* Local prototypes */ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >