From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Berthold Cogel Subject: Re: Acer smart battery: acpi_sbs and linux-2.6.17 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: <44A1AF40.3020701@rrz.uni-koeln.de> References: <449F18D9.7060507@rrz.uni-koeln.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp-out.rrz.uni-koeln.de ([134.95.19.53]:33498 "EHLO smtp-out.rrz.uni-koeln.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422676AbWF0WUr (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:20:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Johan Vromans Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Johan Vromans wrote: > Johan Vromans writes: > >> Hmm. I've yet to see this problem, but I'll be careful (and save >> often) for a while. > It's not that dangerous. The modules 'simply' stop working.... No crash or lost data. Until now ... > But I seem to have lost the ability to hibernate/resume. I consistently > get "swsusp: not enough free memory". Does 2.6.17 take so much more > memory than 2.6.16? > For my System it's only about 1 MB difference in runlevel 1 with 2.6.17.1 compared with 2.6.16.20. But I'm using suspend to disk with suspend2. Berthold