From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:14:47 +0200 Message-ID: <44F83247.8050309@gmx.net> References: <200608311713.21618.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <1157070616.7974.232.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200608312353.05337.len.brown@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:409 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751113AbWIANPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 09:15:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200608312353.05337.len.brown@intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: jg@laptop.org, Linux Kernel ML , Dominik Brodowski , ACPI ML , Adam Belay , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Arjan van de Ven , devel@laptop.org, Bjorn Helgaas Len Brown wrote: > > But frankly, with gaping functionality holes in Linux suspend/resume support such as > IDE and SATA, I think that optimizing for suspend/resume speed on a mainstream laptop > is somewhat "forward looking". OLPC has no IDE/SATA devices, just 512 MB of onboard NAND flash. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/