public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Blakeley <mike@blakeley.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: why use acpi for cpufreq?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:03:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <454684D9.1080805@blakeley.com> (raw)

I've recently been bitten by 
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7157 - I also have an HP 
nc6400, with bios F.05, and can't downgrade to F.03 because my CPU only 
became supported in F.05. While I'm waiting to see if HP will fix this 
problem in a future bios rev, I wondered why cpufreq needs any bios 
information in the first place?

This is all well outside my technical expertise, so I'm sure that I'm 
misunderstanding the problem - but that's why I'm asking. Basically my 
question is: why can't cpufreq interrogate the CPU directly, in order to 
find out what sort of cpu frequency scaling it supports (SpeedStep in 
various flavors, PowerNow, and whatever else is out there in the wild)? 
Wouldn't that be more robust than relying on the bios to get it right?

As a side issue, how does Windows XP solve this problem? From what I can 
tell, Windows XP does use frequency-scaling with my CPU (according to 
the NHC software from http://www.pbus-167.com/).

Again, I'm sure that I'm misunderstanding the technical issues here, but 
I'd like to understand them. I'm also happy to post a summary on the 
acpi wiki, so that the question is less likely to come up again.

thanks,
-- Mike

             reply	other threads:[~2006-10-30 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-30 23:03 Michael Blakeley [this message]
2006-10-31 18:04 ` why use acpi for cpufreq? Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=454684D9.1080805@blakeley.com \
    --to=mike@blakeley.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox