public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* why use acpi for cpufreq?
@ 2006-10-30 23:03 Michael Blakeley
  2006-10-31 18:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Blakeley @ 2006-10-30 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-acpi

I've recently been bitten by 
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7157 - I also have an HP 
nc6400, with bios F.05, and can't downgrade to F.03 because my CPU only 
became supported in F.05. While I'm waiting to see if HP will fix this 
problem in a future bios rev, I wondered why cpufreq needs any bios 
information in the first place?

This is all well outside my technical expertise, so I'm sure that I'm 
misunderstanding the problem - but that's why I'm asking. Basically my 
question is: why can't cpufreq interrogate the CPU directly, in order to 
find out what sort of cpu frequency scaling it supports (SpeedStep in 
various flavors, PowerNow, and whatever else is out there in the wild)? 
Wouldn't that be more robust than relying on the bios to get it right?

As a side issue, how does Windows XP solve this problem? From what I can 
tell, Windows XP does use frequency-scaling with my CPU (according to 
the NHC software from http://www.pbus-167.com/).

Again, I'm sure that I'm misunderstanding the technical issues here, but 
I'd like to understand them. I'm also happy to post a summary on the 
acpi wiki, so that the question is less likely to come up again.

thanks,
-- Mike

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: why use acpi for cpufreq?
  2006-10-30 23:03 why use acpi for cpufreq? Michael Blakeley
@ 2006-10-31 18:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Brodowski @ 2006-10-31 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Blakeley; +Cc: linux-acpi

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 03:03:53PM -0800, Michael Blakeley wrote:
> I've recently been bitten by 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7157 - I also have an HP 
> nc6400, with bios F.05, and can't downgrade to F.03 because my CPU only 
> became supported in F.05. While I'm waiting to see if HP will fix this 
> problem in a future bios rev, I wondered why cpufreq needs any bios 
> information in the first place?
> 
> This is all well outside my technical expertise, so I'm sure that I'm 
> misunderstanding the problem - but that's why I'm asking. Basically my 
> question is: why can't cpufreq interrogate the CPU directly, in order to 
> find out what sort of cpu frequency scaling it supports (SpeedStep in 
> various flavors, PowerNow, and whatever else is out there in the wild)? 
> Wouldn't that be more robust than relying on the bios to get it right?

Unfortunately, no -- it is not only a matter of the processor on whether CPU
frequency and voltage scaling is supported, but also a matter of the
motherboard. Not all combinations of frequencies and voltages which run
stable on one notebook may run well on a different notebook with the same
CPU. Therefore, such hardcoded table-based approaches are only available in
rare cases.

	Dominik

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-31 18:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-30 23:03 why use acpi for cpufreq? Michael Blakeley
2006-10-31 18:04 ` Dominik Brodowski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox