From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: new pmtools available for testing Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:24:26 +0300 Message-ID: <456C0E5A.5090703@linux.intel.com> References: <1164708222.4656.203.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com ([143.182.124.22]:21802 "EHLO azsmga101.ch.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935644AbWK1KeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:34:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1164708222.4656.203.camel@queen.suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: trenn@suse.de Cc: "Moore, Robert" , "Brown, Len" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:13 -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: > >> I don't know what's going on here. >> >> I wrote acpixtract in C in order to get away from Perl and Perl issues. >> >> I certainly hope that we don't have yet another version of acpixtract. >> > Second. > Better remove this one soon. People are packing Len's pmtools. As soon > as it's spread confusion and maintenance work will grow. > There was no confusion between two utilities with the same name, and now you claim to have lost between two with different names, how so? pmtools used to be complete in sense it was able to decode that was it has produced, and it will remain complete. Thanks, Alex.