From: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: "Starikovskiy, Alexey Y" <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Bad libata resume behaviour due to ACPICA change (in acpi-test)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:50:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CB62EE.8020300@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070208153025.GA466@khazad-dum.debian.net>
first thing to check is timing of acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes() at
drivers/acpi/events/evgpe.c:647,
printk() around it should be good.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007, Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote:
>
>> I cannot reproduce your problem with T43 here on linux-acpi-test with
>> defconfig (relevant ACPI modules were tried both dynamic and static).
>> Resume time is about 4-6 seconds, not 20-40 as you mention.
>> Could you please send your .config and try defconfig on your machine?
>>
>
> Sorry for the delay on doing the tests. 2.6.20+acpi-test defconfig does NOT
> do ACPI S3, so I had to use defconfig with SMP turned off (that was the only
> change). Are you sure you tried linux-acpi-test in 2.6.20 defconfig without
> any changes?
>
> gcc is Debian 3.4.6-5. I am avoiding 4.1.1 because of the reports of it
> miscompiling the kernel sometimes.
>
> The bug changed behaviour a little in defconfig. Now, I get the "Restarting
> tasks ... done" right away after the line that used to hang (SCSI device
> sda: write cache...", and THEN it hangs for about 20s.
>
> In my default T43 kernel, I get "Restarting tasks ... done" *before* the
> (SCSI device sda: write cache..." line.
>
> So the hang is still there, it is still 100% reproducible here, but I am not
> sure it has much to do with libata. It might have something to do with
> whatever happens after "Restarting tasks ... done", and libata resume just
> happens to be running in another thread at that time and outputs its stuff
> through printk.
>
> Any ideas on how to debug this further?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-08 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-03 0:41 Bad libata resume behaviour due to ACPICA change (in acpi-test) Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-05 18:51 ` Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
2007-02-05 23:59 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-06 12:17 ` Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
2007-02-06 13:39 ` T43 BIOS and AHCI Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-06 14:02 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-02-08 15:30 ` Bad libata resume behaviour due to ACPICA change (in acpi-test) Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-08 17:50 ` Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
2007-02-08 18:20 ` Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
2007-02-09 3:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-09 6:31 ` Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
2007-02-09 2:59 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-02-09 15:10 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-02-09 18:58 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45CB62EE.8020300@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox