From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] swsusp: Introduce restore platform operations Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 00:10:20 +0400 Message-ID: <46534E2C.60808@gmail.com> References: <200705180019.35548.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070521233848.GN10714@elf.ucw.cz> <200705220155.44430.rjw@sisk.pl> <200705222203.48568.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]:55334 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757498AbXEVUK3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 16:10:29 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 44so407882uga for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 13:10:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200705222203.48568.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Pavel Machek , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list , Johannes Berg Rafael J. Wysocki ?????: > On Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Moreover, I'm not quite certain in which points the GPEs should actually be > > disabled and enabled. For example, there are some testing data indicating that > the enabling of GPEs should be done after all of the device drivers' .resume() > callbacks have run. Opposite, ACPI devices require enabled GPEs to do their resume, so enabling of GPEs should happen at least before .resume() of ACPI devices is called. Regards, Alex.