From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: CPPC: Introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf()
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 15:51:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4692874.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11837325.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
On some systems the nominal_perf value retrieved via CPPC is just
a constant and fetching it doesn't require accessing any registers,
so if it is the only CPPC capability that's needed, it is wasteful
to run cppc_get_perf_caps() in order to get just that value alone,
especially when this is done for CPUs other than the one running
the code.
For this reason, introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf() allowing
nominal_perf to be obtained individually, by generalizing the
existing cppc_get_desired_perf() (and renaming it) so it can be
used to retrieve any specific CPPC capability value.
While at it, clean up the cppc_get_desired_perf() kerneldoc comment
a bit.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ struct cppc_cpudata {
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
extern int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u64 *desired_perf);
+extern int cppc_get_nominal_perf(int cpunum, u64 *nominal_perf);
extern int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs);
extern int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls);
extern int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_caps *caps);
@@ -149,6 +150,10 @@ static inline int cppc_get_desired_perf(
{
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
+static inline int cppc_get_nominal_perf(int cpunum, u64 *nominal_perf)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
static inline int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs)
{
return -ENOTSUPP;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -1008,23 +1008,14 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc
return ret_val;
}
-/**
- * cppc_get_desired_perf - Get the value of desired performance register.
- * @cpunum: CPU from which to get desired performance.
- * @desired_perf: address of a variable to store the returned desired performance
- *
- * Return: 0 for success, -EIO otherwise.
- */
-int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u64 *desired_perf)
+static int cppc_get_perf(int cpunum, enum cppc_regs reg_idx, u64 *perf)
{
struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpunum);
- int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpunum);
- struct cpc_register_resource *desired_reg;
- struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL;
+ struct cpc_register_resource *reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[reg_idx];
- desired_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[DESIRED_PERF];
-
- if (CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg)) {
+ if (CPC_IN_PCC(reg)) {
+ int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpunum);
+ struct cppc_pcc_data *pcc_ss_data = NULL;
int ret = 0;
if (pcc_ss_id < 0)
@@ -1035,7 +1026,7 @@ int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u6
down_write(&pcc_ss_data->pcc_lock);
if (send_pcc_cmd(pcc_ss_id, CMD_READ) >= 0)
- cpc_read(cpunum, desired_reg, desired_perf);
+ cpc_read(cpunum, reg, perf);
else
ret = -EIO;
@@ -1044,13 +1035,37 @@ int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u6
return ret;
}
- cpc_read(cpunum, desired_reg, desired_perf);
+ cpc_read(cpunum, reg, perf);
return 0;
}
+
+/**
+ * cppc_get_desired_perf - Get the desired performance register value.
+ * @cpunum: CPU from which to get desired performance.
+ * @desired_perf: Return address.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success, -EIO otherwise.
+ */
+int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u64 *desired_perf)
+{
+ return cppc_get_perf(cpunum, DESIRED_PERF, desired_perf);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_desired_perf);
/**
+ * cppc_get_nominal_perf - Get the nominal performance register value.
+ * @cpunum: CPU from which to get nominal performance.
+ * @nominal_perf: Return address.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 for success, -EIO otherwise.
+ */
+int cppc_get_nominal_perf(int cpunum, u64 *nominal_perf)
+{
+ return cppc_get_perf(cpunum, NOMINAL_PERF, nominal_perf);
+}
+
+/**
* cppc_get_perf_caps - Get a CPU's performance capabilities.
* @cpunum: CPU from which to get capabilities info.
* @perf_caps: ptr to cppc_perf_caps. See cppc_acpi.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-04 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-04 13:49 [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: Simplify HWP perf levels calibration Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-04 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: hybrid: Rework HWP calibration Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4692874.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox