From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tilman Schmidt Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:39:47 +0200 Message-ID: <46D0AFB3.5080701@imap.cc> References: <20070822020648.5ea3a612.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46CF695D.1020008@imap.cc> <20070824170702.a2c51084.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1188001291.6163.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig594C2F3C21C0AC8070CBEAEE" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1188001291.6163.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: john stultz Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones , Thomas Renninger , Venkatesh Pallipadi List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig594C2F3C21C0AC8070CBEAEE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 25.08.2007 02:21 schrieb john stultz: >> Tilman Schmidt wrote: >>> - on console early during boot, also in SuSE's /var/log/boot.msg: >>> >>> your system time is not correct: >>> Wed Jul 13 13:15:31 UTC 1910 >>> setting system time to: >>> Tue Jul 24 00:00:00 UTC 2007 >=20 > Hrmm. I'm not super familiar w/ SuSE's init scripts, but I'm guessing > that's the ntpdate call. Nope. The ntpdate call comes much later, and finally sets the system cloc= k correctly so that there are no lasting effects of all this. > And "Tuesday Jul 24th"? Sounds about a month > off, is this just stale info? I have no idea where that might come from. >>> /dev/system/root: Superblock last mount time is in the future. FIXED= =2E >>> /dev/system/root: Superblock last write time is in the future. FIXED= =2E >=20 > Does this show up before or after the above date stuff? After the "your system time is not correct" messages, and before the regular "Try to get initial date and time via NTP" message accompanying the ntpdate call. > Does the issue go away using an older kernel (I want to eliminate easy > stuff like CMOS batteries giving up)? It does. Booting 2.6.23-rc3 after that, the system comes up with none of these messages. > Also you're not using Linus' CMOS corrupting suspend/resume debugging > trick, right (I'm forgetting the CONFIG name). PM_TRACE? No. The entire PM_DEBUG branch is turned off. --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Unge=F6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=FCckseite) --------------enig594C2F3C21C0AC8070CBEAEE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG0K+7MdB4Whm86/kRAlyEAJ0TCgveTVgHwanWQ7+W97SRYoJIrgCeIZiU TzqEU74RnDb9n/Oq0SVN+1o= =HDhc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig594C2F3C21C0AC8070CBEAEE--