* Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions
2007-08-29 15:27 ` [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions Michal Piotrowski
@ 2007-08-30 8:21 ` Danny ter Haar
2007-08-31 22:01 ` Len Brown
2007-10-12 11:10 ` Danny ter Haar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Danny ter Haar @ 2007-08-30 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski
Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, LKML
Quoting Michal Piotrowski (michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com):
> Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc4.
> CPUFREQ
> Subject : ide problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/27/298
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/29/371
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : dth <dth@dth.net>
> Caused-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> commit f79e3185dd0f8650022518d7624c876d8929061b
> Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Status : problem is being debugged
I just compiled 2.6.23-rc4 on this setup to check if we made any
progress. After reboot i see:
[SNIP]
NET: Registered protocol family 17
Using IPI Shortcut mode
Freeing unused kernel memory: 148 freed
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /devices/platform/i8042/
printk: 7888020 messages suppressed
init[1]: segfault at 85890000 eip 85890000 esp bfcfcb8c error 4
[more of the last 2 lines repeated over and over]
Am i doing something wrong (very possible) or am i bitten by
another/new phenomena ?
Danny
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions
2007-08-29 15:27 ` [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-30 8:21 ` Danny ter Haar
@ 2007-08-31 22:01 ` Len Brown
2007-10-12 11:10 ` Danny ter Haar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2007-08-31 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, LKML, Len Brown, linux-acpi,
Plamen Petrov, Michael Sedkowski, Alexey Dobriyan, alsa-devel,
Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Ivan N. Zlatev, Thomas Meyer, dth
> ACPI
>
> Subject : 2.6.23-rc4: maxcpus still broken
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/28/87
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru>
> Caused-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> commit 61ec7567db103d537329b0db9a887db570431ff4
> Handled-By : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Status : problem is being debugged
>
Hugh debugged and fixed this one, and it is checked into 2.6.23-rc4-git3
62e6f1e8bb7c48c02b8bdb3085c5f6365682149b
fix maxcpus=1 oops in show_stat()
thanks,
-Len
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions
2007-08-29 15:27 ` [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-30 8:21 ` Danny ter Haar
2007-08-31 22:01 ` Len Brown
@ 2007-10-12 11:10 ` Danny ter Haar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Danny ter Haar @ 2007-10-12 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Len Brown, linux-acpi
Quoting Michal Piotrowski (michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com):
> CPUFREQ
> Subject : ide problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/27/298
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/29/371
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : dth <dth@dth.net>
> Caused-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> commit f79e3185dd0f8650022518d7624c876d8929061b
> Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Status : problem is being debugged
Since i dont get _any_ feedback on my reports/emails,
i think it's best if we just ignore this problem.
Danny
--
Feedback is the breakfast of champions
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread