From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maciek Rutecki Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on Toshiba Satellite A40 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:33:45 +0200 Message-ID: <46F2A0E9.9000603@gmail.com> References: <200709192014.08443.elendil@planet.nl> <20070920105312.GC12157@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200709201437.56431.elendil@planet.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:49969 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757528AbXITQdt (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:33:49 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so410839ugc for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200709201437.56431.elendil@planet.nl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Frans Pop Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Frans Pop pisze: >>> [...] >>> -ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) >>> +ACPI: (supports S0 S3) >> Unexpected, and potentially pretty serious. Something went wrong with >> ACPI. Can you try to narrow down when it started happening? > > rc1 still had all 4 levels. I'll run a bisect between rc1 and rc6. 2.6.23-rc1 OK (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) 2.6.23-rc2 wrong: (supports S0 S3)