public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ACPI Exception triggered by pata_amd driver in 2.6.24, is this an ACPI bug?
@ 2007-10-24 18:00 Andrew
  2007-10-25 10:53 ` Thomas Renninger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew @ 2007-10-24 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-acpi

Hi,

This is probably nothing since there seems to be no ill effects
but I thought someone should know because...well it bothers me.

Heres a diff of the kernel boot log between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24:

 scsi4 : pata_amd
 scsi5 : pata_amd
-ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00000000000101f0 ctl 0x00000000000103f6 bmdma
0x000000000001ffa0 irq 14
-ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0000000000010170 ctl 0x0000000000010376 bmdma
0x000000000001ffa8 irq 15
+ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xffa0 irq 14
+ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xffa8 irq 15
+ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0FFFFFFFF) is beyond end of
object [20070126]
+ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.GTM_] (Node
ffff810002001740), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
+ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1._GTM] (Node
ffff810002001620), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
+ata6: ACPI get timing mode failed (AE 0x300d)
 ata6.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4167B, DL13, max UDMA/33
 ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33

...and lspci output:

00:0d.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 IDE (rev a1) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
        Subsystem: Unknown device f043:81bc
        Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR-
FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort-
>SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0 (750ns min, 250ns max)
        Region 0: [virtual] Memory at 000001f0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=8]
        Region 1: [virtual] Memory at 000003f0 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=1]
        Region 2: [virtual] Memory at 00000170 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=8]
        Region 3: [virtual] Memory at 00000370 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=1]
        Region 4: I/O ports at ffa0 [size=16]
        Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

So, is it a bug?
Please CC as I am not subscribed.

Andrew


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: ACPI Exception triggered by pata_amd driver in 2.6.24, is this an ACPI bug?
  2007-10-24 18:00 ACPI Exception triggered by pata_amd driver in 2.6.24, is this an ACPI bug? Andrew
@ 2007-10-25 10:53 ` Thomas Renninger
  2007-10-26  1:16   ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2007-10-25 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew; +Cc: linux-acpi, Tejun Heo

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:00 +0100, Andrew wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is probably nothing since there seems to be no ill effects
> but I thought someone should know because...well it bothers me.
> 
> Heres a diff of the kernel boot log between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24:
> 
>  scsi4 : pata_amd
>  scsi5 : pata_amd
> -ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00000000000101f0 ctl 0x00000000000103f6 bmdma
> 0x000000000001ffa0 irq 14
> -ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0000000000010170 ctl 0x0000000000010376 bmdma
> 0x000000000001ffa8 irq 15
> +ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xffa0 irq 14
> +ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xffa8 irq 15
> +ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0FFFFFFFF) is beyond end of
> object [20070126]
> +ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.GTM_] (Node
> ffff810002001740), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
> +ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1._GTM] (Node
> ffff810002001620), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
> +ata6: ACPI get timing mode failed (AE 0x300d)
>  ata6.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4167B, DL13, max UDMA/33
>  ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
I doubt the ACPI interpreter broke between those kernels...
Is this the same message as seen when _GTM/_STM were invoked in wrong
order (or the one not invoked at all)?
Tejun might be interested in this one...

Thanks,

   Thomas
> 
> ...and lspci output:
> 
> 00:0d.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 IDE (rev a1) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
>         Subsystem: Unknown device f043:81bc
>         Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR-
> FastB2B- DisINTx-
>         Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort-
> >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Latency: 0 (750ns min, 250ns max)
>         Region 0: [virtual] Memory at 000001f0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=8]
>         Region 1: [virtual] Memory at 000003f0 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=1]
>         Region 2: [virtual] Memory at 00000170 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=8]
>         Region 3: [virtual] Memory at 00000370 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=1]
>         Region 4: I/O ports at ffa0 [size=16]
>         Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
>                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
>                 Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> 
> So, is it a bug?
> Please CC as I am not subscribed.
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: ACPI Exception triggered by pata_amd driver in 2.6.24, is this an ACPI bug?
  2007-10-25 10:53 ` Thomas Renninger
@ 2007-10-26  1:16   ` Tejun Heo
  2007-10-26 12:34     ` Andrew
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-10-26  1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: trenn; +Cc: Andrew, linux-acpi

Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:00 +0100, Andrew wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is probably nothing since there seems to be no ill effects
>> but I thought someone should know because...well it bothers me.
>>
>> Heres a diff of the kernel boot log between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24:
>>
>>  scsi4 : pata_amd
>>  scsi5 : pata_amd
>> -ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x00000000000101f0 ctl 0x00000000000103f6 bmdma
>> 0x000000000001ffa0 irq 14
>> -ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0000000000010170 ctl 0x0000000000010376 bmdma
>> 0x000000000001ffa8 irq 15
>> +ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xffa0 irq 14
>> +ata6: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xffa8 irq 15
>> +ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0FFFFFFFF) is beyond end of
>> object [20070126]
>> +ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.GTM_] (Node
>> ffff810002001740), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
>> +ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.CHN1._GTM] (Node
>> ffff810002001620), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
>> +ata6: ACPI get timing mode failed (AE 0x300d)
>>  ata6.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4167B, DL13, max UDMA/33
>>  ata6.00: configured for UDMA/33
> I doubt the ACPI interpreter broke between those kernels...
> Is this the same message as seen when _GTM/_STM were invoked in wrong
> order (or the one not invoked at all)?
> Tejun might be interested in this one...

ATA ACPI is now turned on by default.  It's quite likely that ATA part 
of the ACPI table on that machine is broken.  Can you try to update the 
BIOS?

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: ACPI Exception triggered by pata_amd driver in 2.6.24, is this an ACPI bug?
  2007-10-26  1:16   ` Tejun Heo
@ 2007-10-26 12:34     ` Andrew
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew @ 2007-10-26 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-acpi

On Fri, October 26, 2007 02:16, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> ATA ACPI is now turned on by default.  It's quite likely that ATA part
> of the ACPI table on that machine is broken.  Can you try to update the BIOS?
>
>
> --
> tejun
>

The BIOS is already up to date and I don't think the mobo manufacturer
has any intention of ever bringing out a new version. I guess I will
just disable ATA_ACPI.

--
Andrew





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-26 12:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-24 18:00 ACPI Exception triggered by pata_amd driver in 2.6.24, is this an ACPI bug? Andrew
2007-10-25 10:53 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-10-26  1:16   ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-26 12:34     ` Andrew

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox